What do I miss in the germ hypothesis equation that gives any functional weight to humans/animals regarding the spread of disease? We exist in a ubiquitous sea of bacteria and the same is claimed of viruses. What essential role is it that humans/animals are claimed to play?
It was written by Dr. John Henry Tilden of the American Society of Natural Hygiene. Most of improvement to public health came from the early Hygienists and the popular Hygiene movement that pushed from removing sewage and garbage from littering the streets.
Off topic, but I would like to find something of yours I read a few months ago. You had linked several studies which failed to prove person-to-person transmission of viruses. One of them was very recent; an actual COVID trial. I've browsed your articles diligently, but for the life of me can't find it.
Mass hysteria shows up as anomalous to physical reality for those Not in its grip or after the shock has subsided.
Personal hysteria can mimic or pass off as disease - with or without symptoms - such as to be socially invisible.
The nature of our personal & social identity is a masking over, as a means of maintaining a functional focus in 'our consciousness' (as mental 'health') and world (as social function).
But for most, identity is set in dogma of a mind set in its own postulates. We learn & grow a masking adaptation within our self as with others and world - through which to live our experience of an embodied life running beneath an augmented or virtual frame of meanings set within a self-conditioned sense of self – taking its 'reality' from awareness of existence within the specific terrain of inner correspondences to outer conditions.
The former is of the nature of embracing Soul or Communication of, in and as Life - direct Participance cannot be substituted for by thought, but mind can be phished by its own image, to 'suffer or abide as' the grasp of a possessive or the recoil of attempt to get rid of its self - (hated or feared).
The psyche and its pathic or split minded conflict are one coin with two sides.
But a conflict persisted in must mask as a unified 'self' by the projection of its denials to the 'othered' by the Accuser as the basis for the Adversary by which to substitute struggle in terms of a masked deceit or threat 'hidden' in a world of treachery - for does not a seeming love so readily turn to hate? When the Enemy is 'scaped' or denied, does it not shift to another - indeed to any form or nature?
The need for 'enemy' is the 'defence-complex' running in our name as if self-protective but in truth sacrificial to defences that DO (or persist) the very thing they are held to save from.
Truth as our given or created awareness is no more trapped in thought by the emotional physical experience of thoughts given priority by reaction. But we have this experience as the framing of our life, self and world. More or less masking over a qualitatively felt nature of being that seems to be absent, denied or powerless to an inertial drama of a seeming compelled or driven momentum.
"And who told you you were naked?" said the Lord - represents the rising awareness of our being to the belief & experience of death of love or connection by which a separated, abandoned, rejected sense of self-lack must become the means of its own 'survival' in the set of its own 'terms'. As such is the living questioning of a dead world set in image & concept, by which to be healed or undone of our own grasping predicates and consequences or interpreted judgements.
Sickness as defence against truth, is extension of the use of body as masking limit and distance - by which attack is made real, and love weak, powerless & false.
Yet body-as-communication is the spectrum of tangible experience from 'gross to subtle'.
To use the body as the mind is in this way to be phished by a framework FOR experience, and tooled by technology of a-tempt to manipulate externally in 'solutions' to un-owned or discarded and denied inner relational conflicts.
Thus we inhabit or are entranced or our own 'solutions' running repackaged 'reality' as a world of 'lies' that runs out of space and time in which to hide or push out conflicts into be-live-able experience. So we experience a breakdown of world in ways our minds cannot understand but can only double down in existential survival - each as framed by our own interpretative condition.
Deconstructing the mask is the gift of the Holy Spirit (the movement of truth of being), the ego will gladly 'deconstruct its own masking' to more deeply hide in its own 'solutions'.
The difference is qualitative. Joy in being is wholeness now - as a flow of communication of true with-ness in shared worth-ship. Extension of life is its-our Nature, while the recoil of a self-inflation sets a withholding & withdrawal from our Field of Relation, as "an over abundance of stress or strain" seeking to normalise its condition by framing in limitation serving redistribution of fear, pain & loss.
In our terms read wealth, possession and control.
We cannot 'think' our true need met from the mind that set us in false 'solutions' that drive an abundance of lack (debt & misery). But our mind & thought shall be renewed by yielding up our 'predicates' to a love of unmanufactured truth.
As we release invested self-illusion, intuition of Life rises unobstructed.
That the mind-habit is persistent reflects a basis for natural discipline in place of struggle set in 'will to power'.
To be with our experience is in a sense undefended yet willingly present. Unconsciousness is not a solution to pain - which always has a root in the heart of life - even if 'justifiably' attributable to pathological or diabolical agents.
Thanks for the text box for sharing in the themes of our times!
Let’s go extreme. The official name of “extreme” is Science. Science follows logic and rationalization. Then…
In the same household, one person has a cold, and the other three are completely unaffected. Germs or terrain? Neither.
Not germs because logic kills germs right on arrival: if germs are so selective that they affect one organism and skip others, their intelligence exceeds the intelligence of the human immune system (assuming that it exists). If that was true, the last human being would have been killed by germs 70 million years ago.
Not terrain. We cannot know or describe the terrain. Its complexity is beyond the minds of all scientists combined. We don’t know how it works. But we can “learn” a bit about simple organisms like bacteria. They appear to be identical functionally, or even physically (worked out in the same gym, apparently). On the assumption of complete and total uniformity of bacterial organisms drugs are being developed and produced.
This means that all bacteria of the same species are the same = have the same potential, power, attributes, and so on. But this is an assumption only. Has anyone examined bacteria in terms of their varied functionalities? I don’t know, but it would be very interesting to see that (for example) week, undernourished bacteria easily affect human beings of specific physiological structure (like the elderly), and the strongest athletic bacteria can affect only athletic human beings. Or the other way round. A lot to speculate, a nice ground for another Nobel.
If all bacteria are of the same hazard category, the terrain must be resistant to them all. It follows from the assumptions of carrying over immune resistance from the mother and increasing the immune resistance potential of the human body through exposure and contact with various pathogens. And we are told that flu germs or cold germs are always present in the ambient atmosphere 24/7 - no way a 2-year-old child could skip rubbing its skin or lungs against the backs of the germs. Moreover, people would die in bulk all the time if this were true.
Maybe the hereditary learning and environmental learning of the immune system is another theory based on logical assumptions - developed first to get some comfort in the face of helplessness, and then spread to gain traction among everybody and justify cashflows from drugs.
It all looks so complicated. What about other organisms? Why doesn’t fish catch cold? Why don’t birds catch colds? Both are 24/7 exposed to extreme external factors, varying at speeds that bacteria cannot comprehend. Flying from a cold space into nice warm soaring currents - with associated changing pressure (which human beings are not subjected to), changing humidity (same) and radiation exposures (same). Does it mean that birds have terrain made of steel, completely overpowering everything except merciless hunters?
Fish lives in a space filled with nasty stuff, the whole life. Not a single evening watching Bear Grylls. No colds? Is their terrain superfishy or are aquatic germs bored with it and not interested?
What about rats? Thriving on bad things. No colds? Or… maybe rats have rat colds that are invisible to us? Just like bats - that can fly blind and enjoy freedom because they have some functionalities which we cannot understand.
Just pointing to a third option: no germs, no terrain, something completely different. Why not?
I would like to become as strong a terrain supporter as you are, but I can't. At least not yet.
I know some of the effects the terrain can have. I pretty much have figured out how the terrain can cause, or most likely contribute, to one disorder that affects over a billion people. The terrain is not everything though. I wish it were. There is genetics too and quantum mechanics…
I trust no-one until proven not guilty. Sorry but I've learned my lesson not only from covid-19 nonsense.
Since you are a religious person- I’ve found out from Bailey's interview recently- I would like you to review and come to your own opinion on this issue.
In ancient times, the Hebrews, now called the Jews, were told to isolate if they had symptoms of leprosy. Why would they do that if this was a toxic or other than infectious disease? Not only that, specific symptoms were obvious they were to burn their clothes, and even their homes.
Why?
If you believe the bible is of some value, you should look into it. However, it looks like leprosy, called Henson’s disease today, is not the same today. But neither is our genetic isolation.
Just a side note. I do not mean to speak negatively of the Baileys. But when I brought this particular issue to their attention, they seem to have changed their narrative. You can see that after my intervention when their videos no longer featured the bible on the shelf behind them when they did their videos and they stopped quoting scriptures. I would like to know why... I’m not judging them but just I'm curious a s to why? Are you?
They claim to search for truth, right?
I just would like to make sure the truth they are searching for is not as they see it, or they would like it to be. You?
What do I miss in the germ hypothesis equation that gives any functional weight to humans/animals regarding the spread of disease? We exist in a ubiquitous sea of bacteria and the same is claimed of viruses. What essential role is it that humans/animals are claimed to play?
Please investigate the variable "E-Cigarettes.”
🚨🚨ONE OF THE BIGGEST BOMBSHELLS 🚨🚨
https://manuherold.substack.com/p/bombshell-the-recent-uptick-in-vaping
I found this book related to the Terrain theory on disease: https://openlibrary.org/works/OL6900886W/Toxemia_the_basic_cause_of_disease?edition=toxemiabasiccaus00til_8cb
It was written by Dr. John Henry Tilden of the American Society of Natural Hygiene. Most of improvement to public health came from the early Hygienists and the popular Hygiene movement that pushed from removing sewage and garbage from littering the streets.
Mike,
Off topic, but I would like to find something of yours I read a few months ago. You had linked several studies which failed to prove person-to-person transmission of viruses. One of them was very recent; an actual COVID trial. I've browsed your articles diligently, but for the life of me can't find it.
Could you point me in the right direction?
Thanks so much!
"an over abundance of stress or strain"
Mass hysteria shows up as anomalous to physical reality for those Not in its grip or after the shock has subsided.
Personal hysteria can mimic or pass off as disease - with or without symptoms - such as to be socially invisible.
The nature of our personal & social identity is a masking over, as a means of maintaining a functional focus in 'our consciousness' (as mental 'health') and world (as social function).
But for most, identity is set in dogma of a mind set in its own postulates. We learn & grow a masking adaptation within our self as with others and world - through which to live our experience of an embodied life running beneath an augmented or virtual frame of meanings set within a self-conditioned sense of self – taking its 'reality' from awareness of existence within the specific terrain of inner correspondences to outer conditions.
The former is of the nature of embracing Soul or Communication of, in and as Life - direct Participance cannot be substituted for by thought, but mind can be phished by its own image, to 'suffer or abide as' the grasp of a possessive or the recoil of attempt to get rid of its self - (hated or feared).
The psyche and its pathic or split minded conflict are one coin with two sides.
But a conflict persisted in must mask as a unified 'self' by the projection of its denials to the 'othered' by the Accuser as the basis for the Adversary by which to substitute struggle in terms of a masked deceit or threat 'hidden' in a world of treachery - for does not a seeming love so readily turn to hate? When the Enemy is 'scaped' or denied, does it not shift to another - indeed to any form or nature?
The need for 'enemy' is the 'defence-complex' running in our name as if self-protective but in truth sacrificial to defences that DO (or persist) the very thing they are held to save from.
Truth as our given or created awareness is no more trapped in thought by the emotional physical experience of thoughts given priority by reaction. But we have this experience as the framing of our life, self and world. More or less masking over a qualitatively felt nature of being that seems to be absent, denied or powerless to an inertial drama of a seeming compelled or driven momentum.
"And who told you you were naked?" said the Lord - represents the rising awareness of our being to the belief & experience of death of love or connection by which a separated, abandoned, rejected sense of self-lack must become the means of its own 'survival' in the set of its own 'terms'. As such is the living questioning of a dead world set in image & concept, by which to be healed or undone of our own grasping predicates and consequences or interpreted judgements.
Sickness as defence against truth, is extension of the use of body as masking limit and distance - by which attack is made real, and love weak, powerless & false.
Yet body-as-communication is the spectrum of tangible experience from 'gross to subtle'.
To use the body as the mind is in this way to be phished by a framework FOR experience, and tooled by technology of a-tempt to manipulate externally in 'solutions' to un-owned or discarded and denied inner relational conflicts.
Thus we inhabit or are entranced or our own 'solutions' running repackaged 'reality' as a world of 'lies' that runs out of space and time in which to hide or push out conflicts into be-live-able experience. So we experience a breakdown of world in ways our minds cannot understand but can only double down in existential survival - each as framed by our own interpretative condition.
Deconstructing the mask is the gift of the Holy Spirit (the movement of truth of being), the ego will gladly 'deconstruct its own masking' to more deeply hide in its own 'solutions'.
The difference is qualitative. Joy in being is wholeness now - as a flow of communication of true with-ness in shared worth-ship. Extension of life is its-our Nature, while the recoil of a self-inflation sets a withholding & withdrawal from our Field of Relation, as "an over abundance of stress or strain" seeking to normalise its condition by framing in limitation serving redistribution of fear, pain & loss.
In our terms read wealth, possession and control.
We cannot 'think' our true need met from the mind that set us in false 'solutions' that drive an abundance of lack (debt & misery). But our mind & thought shall be renewed by yielding up our 'predicates' to a love of unmanufactured truth.
As we release invested self-illusion, intuition of Life rises unobstructed.
That the mind-habit is persistent reflects a basis for natural discipline in place of struggle set in 'will to power'.
To be with our experience is in a sense undefended yet willingly present. Unconsciousness is not a solution to pain - which always has a root in the heart of life - even if 'justifiably' attributable to pathological or diabolical agents.
Thanks for the text box for sharing in the themes of our times!
Let’s go extreme. The official name of “extreme” is Science. Science follows logic and rationalization. Then…
In the same household, one person has a cold, and the other three are completely unaffected. Germs or terrain? Neither.
Not germs because logic kills germs right on arrival: if germs are so selective that they affect one organism and skip others, their intelligence exceeds the intelligence of the human immune system (assuming that it exists). If that was true, the last human being would have been killed by germs 70 million years ago.
Not terrain. We cannot know or describe the terrain. Its complexity is beyond the minds of all scientists combined. We don’t know how it works. But we can “learn” a bit about simple organisms like bacteria. They appear to be identical functionally, or even physically (worked out in the same gym, apparently). On the assumption of complete and total uniformity of bacterial organisms drugs are being developed and produced.
This means that all bacteria of the same species are the same = have the same potential, power, attributes, and so on. But this is an assumption only. Has anyone examined bacteria in terms of their varied functionalities? I don’t know, but it would be very interesting to see that (for example) week, undernourished bacteria easily affect human beings of specific physiological structure (like the elderly), and the strongest athletic bacteria can affect only athletic human beings. Or the other way round. A lot to speculate, a nice ground for another Nobel.
If all bacteria are of the same hazard category, the terrain must be resistant to them all. It follows from the assumptions of carrying over immune resistance from the mother and increasing the immune resistance potential of the human body through exposure and contact with various pathogens. And we are told that flu germs or cold germs are always present in the ambient atmosphere 24/7 - no way a 2-year-old child could skip rubbing its skin or lungs against the backs of the germs. Moreover, people would die in bulk all the time if this were true.
Maybe the hereditary learning and environmental learning of the immune system is another theory based on logical assumptions - developed first to get some comfort in the face of helplessness, and then spread to gain traction among everybody and justify cashflows from drugs.
It all looks so complicated. What about other organisms? Why doesn’t fish catch cold? Why don’t birds catch colds? Both are 24/7 exposed to extreme external factors, varying at speeds that bacteria cannot comprehend. Flying from a cold space into nice warm soaring currents - with associated changing pressure (which human beings are not subjected to), changing humidity (same) and radiation exposures (same). Does it mean that birds have terrain made of steel, completely overpowering everything except merciless hunters?
Fish lives in a space filled with nasty stuff, the whole life. Not a single evening watching Bear Grylls. No colds? Is their terrain superfishy or are aquatic germs bored with it and not interested?
What about rats? Thriving on bad things. No colds? Or… maybe rats have rat colds that are invisible to us? Just like bats - that can fly blind and enjoy freedom because they have some functionalities which we cannot understand.
Just pointing to a third option: no germs, no terrain, something completely different. Why not?
Please investigate the variable "E-Cigarettes.”
🚨🚨ONE OF THE BIGGEST BOMBSHELLS 🚨🚨
https://manuherold.substack.com/p/bombshell-the-recent-uptick-in-vaping
Thomas, I have looked into scriptures and my paper should answer your question on leprosy. https://docs.google.com/document/d/e/2PACX-1vT14y9fEKOEZzlVls7uNbA0g1lRfOtMtqbxhpEe7kjVE8fMkMeACP1nugoV-c_ZkI5LVJlJyxGbthWC/pub
Mike,
I would like to become as strong a terrain supporter as you are, but I can't. At least not yet.
I know some of the effects the terrain can have. I pretty much have figured out how the terrain can cause, or most likely contribute, to one disorder that affects over a billion people. The terrain is not everything though. I wish it were. There is genetics too and quantum mechanics…
I trust no-one until proven not guilty. Sorry but I've learned my lesson not only from covid-19 nonsense.
Since you are a religious person- I’ve found out from Bailey's interview recently- I would like you to review and come to your own opinion on this issue.
In ancient times, the Hebrews, now called the Jews, were told to isolate if they had symptoms of leprosy. Why would they do that if this was a toxic or other than infectious disease? Not only that, specific symptoms were obvious they were to burn their clothes, and even their homes.
Why?
If you believe the bible is of some value, you should look into it. However, it looks like leprosy, called Henson’s disease today, is not the same today. But neither is our genetic isolation.
Just a side note. I do not mean to speak negatively of the Baileys. But when I brought this particular issue to their attention, they seem to have changed their narrative. You can see that after my intervention when their videos no longer featured the bible on the shelf behind them when they did their videos and they stopped quoting scriptures. I would like to know why... I’m not judging them but just I'm curious a s to why? Are you?
They claim to search for truth, right?
I just would like to make sure the truth they are searching for is not as they see it, or they would like it to be. You?
Truth is hard to find though…