Uncovering the Corona Fraud Part 19

June 7th, 2020 through June 13th, 2020

The Uncovering the Corona Fraud series is an extra benefit for paid subscribers. It is made up of old Facebook posts that I did on various articles and studies throughout the last few years of the “pandemic.” I provide updated commentary to go along with each of the included posts. This series is an effort to review and learn from the past in order to avoid repeating the mistakes in the present and future.

Throughout the buildup of the “pandemic,” the idea that there were healthy people who were secretly passing on a “deadly novel virus” was promoted by the health organizations and the mainstream media. These people were given the moniker of asymptomatic carriers, which according to Merriam-Webster, means that they not marked by, or presenting with signs or symptoms of infection, illness, or disease. “Covid-19” poster boy Anthony Fauci stated as early as January 31st, 2020, that there was “no doubt” that asymptomatic transmission was occurring amongst the population:

‘There’s no doubt’: Top US infectious disease doctor says Wuhan coronavirus can spread even when people have no symptoms

"There's no doubt after reading this paper that asymptomatic transmission is occurring," said Dr. Anthony Fauci, director of the National Institute for Allergy and Infectious Diseases. "This study lays the question to rest."

https://www.google.com/amp/s/amp.cnn.com/cnn/2020/01/31/health/coronavirus-asymptomatic-spread-study/index.html

However, there was a bit of a problem with Fauci's hasty jump to conclusions. The study that he had confidently asserted “lays the question to rest” was actually flawed. A Science article a few days later reported that it had turned out that Fauci's information was, in fact, wrong. While the researchers of the study that Fauci had cited believed that the subject of the study, a businesswoman from Shanghai, had no symptoms of disease, they had never actually spoken with her in order to find out for certain whether or not this was the case. The researchers had only spoken to the four people whom it was claimed that she had “infected.” They all believed that she appeared to have no symptoms at the time. Conversely, it was revealed by the Robert Koch Institute that they had actually spoken with the woman, and that she had felt tiredness, muscle pain, and had a fever at the time, and had taken medication to treat her symptoms. Thus, the woman was not asymptomatic as Fauci believed, and the study did not lay the asymptomatic question to rest at all.

Study claiming new coronavirus can be transmitted by people without symptoms was flawed

“But the researchers didn't actually speak to the woman before they published the paper. The last author, Michael Hoelscher of the Ludwig Maximilian University of Munich Medical Center, says the paper relied on information from the four other patients: "They told us that the patient from China did not appear to have any symptoms." Afterward, however, officials at the Robert Koch Institute (RKI), Germany's federal public health agency, and the Health and Food Safety Authority of the state of Bavaria did talk to the Shanghai patient on the phone, and it turned out she did have symptoms while in Germany. According to people familiar with the call, she felt tired, suffered from muscle pain, and took paracetamol, a fever-lowering medication. (An RKI spokesperson would only confirm to Science that the woman had symptoms.)”

https://www.science.org/content/article/paper-non-symptomatic-patient-transmitting-coronavirus-wrong

It is rather ironic that it was the Robert Koch Institute that blew the lid on the flaws within Fauci's study that supposedly “proved” asymptomatic transmission, as it is because of German bacteriologist Robert Koch that this asymptomatic concept even exists at all. When Koch made his famous postulates that must be fulfilled in order to prove any microbe causes disease, his logic and common sense told him that a “pathogenic agent” should not be found within those who are healthy. If a microbe that is supposed to cause disease is found within the healthy, it immediately fails Koch's first postulate which states:

1. The microorganism must be found in abundance in all cases of those suffering from the disease, but should not be found in healthy subjects.

Unfortunately for Koch and his quote above, he regularly found the “pathogenic” microbes (specifically the bacteria for tuberculosis, cholera, and typhoid) in cases of those who had no disease. Thus, he could never satisfy his first postulate in order to claim that any microbe he discovered were the true causes of disease. Not wanting to give up his fame, fortune, and prestige, Koch bent his own logic and allowed for the unfalsifiable concept of asymptomatic carriers in order to keep his findings intact. Due to his deplorable actions, we have been left with an illogical premise that has tricked many into fearing everyone around them regardless of whether they are experiencing disease.

As the asymptomatic carrier concept took center stage during the “Covid-19” fear propaganda campaign, we were left with a verifiable “do they or don't they” scenario throughout as the story regularly shifted and changed as to how much or how little asymptomatic transmission was a factor in spreading disease. To those looking at this critically and logically, the illogical idea of asymptomatic carriers and transmission was a major factor in waking them up to the fraud. Even for those who were still believers, the ever-changing narrative left them confused and frustrated, not knowing what to believe. Interestingly, there was a rather shocking slip-up that occurred in early June of 2020 that vindicated those who understood that the asymptomatic concept was fraudulent and should have been the deathblow for those who clung on to their erroneous beliefs.

We will cover the asymptomatic slip-up in a few of the posts discussed below, as well as other topics including:

• Evidence against the accuracy of the “Covid” tests released on EUA.

• The reasons for the “defund the police” agenda that ramped up alongside “Covid.”

• The dangerous effects attributed to antibiotic use.

• The continued attempts to claim that Kawasaki Disease was a new “Covid” condition known as either PIMS or MIS-C.

• More evidence that people were succumbing to pre-existing conditions rather than a “novel virus.”

• Facebook censorship over the asymptomatic slip-up.

• The admitted inability to transmit the “virus” in various ways.

• Continued evidence that we had a Testing Pandemic, and not a “viral” one.

And much more!