They just don't understand because of the indoctrination. I'm so thankful that I have broken out of the germ theory crap.. thanks to people like Mike and Amanda and Dr Sam Bailey and hopefully the list will be added to thank you thank you thank you
Only the most torturously hypnotized of materialists could believe in these "magic particles." The stacking of illogical assumptions to "explain" "antibodies" is almost impossible for me to follow.
DeSantis offered "free" injections of monoclonal antibodies before, and they are just as bad as the "vaccines" or, for that matter, dental anesthetics. Plenty of things are present in plenty of things, and they can affect each other without any human being able to figure out how:
Interesting read. Thoroughly enjoyed it. I do have a couple of questions though. How do we explain the runaway success that many antibody-based biologic therapies have demonstrated in inflammatory disorders like rheumatoid arthritis?! Similarly monoclonal antibodies have been developed for multiple targets Ib cancer pathogenesis. How do you explain these phenomena?! 🤔
Great question. From a terrain perspective, certain therapies and drugs—like so-called "monoclonal antibodies"—may reduce symptoms, but that doesn’t prove the disease was caused by the molecule being targeted, nor that the "antibody" is acting in the precise, targeted way that’s often claimed. Steroids also reduce inflammation, yet no one suggests they treat the root cause—they simply dampen symptoms. It's like turning off a fire alarm while the fire still burns: it may bring short-term relief, but it doesn't resolve why the dis-ease process was activated in the first place.
There’s also a logical error often overlooked in these discussions: assuming that because a treatment has an effect, it validates the causal theory behind it. That’s like saying aspirin curing a headache proves the headache was caused by an aspirin deficiency. Just because the use of a "monoclonal antibody" results in a reduction of inflammation in some doesn’t mean the body was malfunctioning due to a lack of that lab-engineered molecule—or that an immune “target” was the root cause of disease.
In the case of cancer, terrain theory would emphasize that malignancies arise not from rogue cells gone wild, but from a prolonged state of toxicity, malnourishment, emotional stress, and energetic imbalance in the body. The use of "monoclonal antibodies" may interfere with cell signaling or temporarily slow tumor growth, but this doesn’t mean the tumor was caused by an overexpressed protein or antigen. What’s being targeted may simply be a natural byproduct or adaptive expression of the tissue responding to a deteriorating internal environment. Disrupting these responses might lead to short-term changes, but unless the terrain is truly restored, the underlying imbalance remains—and often returns in different or more aggressive forms.
We also can’t discount the placebo effect, especially in subjective inflammatory conditions, or the body’s own adaptive responses to intervention, as reasons for perceived effectiveness. Regardless, many patients experience waning benefits or serious side effects over time. That’s entirely consistent with the terrain view: the root imbalance has not been corrected—only temporarily suppressed.
In other words, "antibody-based" biologics don’t prove the existence or behavior of "antibodies" as claimed. They function as high-tech symptom suppressors—just another way of chemically manipulating the terrain, not restoring it.
Well, at least we can rule out that these elusive, gyrating glycoproteins aren't shaped like an "O", but that still leaves about 21 letters to choose from which can schematically incorporate at least two identical bivalent binding sites:
My guess is a group of "scientists" blindfolded themselves and threw darts at an image of the alphabet. Whichever letter had the most darts at the end won. "Scientific consensus." 😉
Yes but did they give themselves away by showing the antibody with a disulfide bond? Isn’t that the perfect spot to introduce arsenic in one of its many forms into the body?
That is a very interesting point. I know that arsenic has been used to poison people for quite some time, as was the case as when it was used as an old remedy for disease as well as when it was utilized as a pesticide. Are you thinking that arsenic is being used in "antibody" treatments?
Not necessarily but since the disulfide bond is where the body trades phosphate for arsenic it makes me suspicious. I’m not saying there is a disulfide bond but they did. It’s a little slip possibly. I just found that curious.
There’s an app that demonstrates the levels of arsine gas mixed with silica to help propel it downward, showing the measurement of arsine gas in the air at 3,000 feet. I learned of this from Boom Report which is on substate by Caroline Coreman. She repeated on these findings and using an app, Windy you can keep us when your area is under heavy spray. There is another app that I can’t recall the name because it’s German but I can find it if anyone is interested.
Caroline reports on England primarily but I set the app to monitor the US as well.
I’ve been researching the use of arsenic in its many forms for many years as I’ve had severe illness due to arsenic poisoning. It was a war to have my testing done to determine this but I knew intuitively that’s what was wrong. It’s the poison of kings and the king of poisons. These controllers are clever but they have limited items in their playbook. I believe it’s one of the toxins used to cause any illness they then define as a virus. There are many others but arsenic is colorless, odorless, slow to kill and causes all the usual symptoms of a virus. Pick a virus and you’ll find the symptoms of arsenic poisoning in one of its many forms.
Thanks for all your research!
I wrote a song about antibodies, which may be appropriate to share here. 😁
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BQ3_wvUtgic
Thank you, Nina, for sharing your very catchy song! 🙂
My pleasure. Not many people I can share it with... 😉
They just don't understand because of the indoctrination. I'm so thankful that I have broken out of the germ theory crap.. thanks to people like Mike and Amanda and Dr Sam Bailey and hopefully the list will be added to thank you thank you thank you
I'm also so thankful to have broken out of that false paradigm (among others). Very freeing! Unfortunately also very isolating...
This is absolutely excellent thank you so much for sharing this song Love it love it love it
Thank you Jack! So nice to hear...
You'd probably like The Germ Theory Song also...
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cwStXE3oDRU
Only the most torturously hypnotized of materialists could believe in these "magic particles." The stacking of illogical assumptions to "explain" "antibodies" is almost impossible for me to follow.
Antibodies form as needed, based on the body's memory of illnesses.
Antigen tests are just as fraudulent as the existence of pathogenic "viruses":
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-can-you-say
DeSantis offered "free" injections of monoclonal antibodies before, and they are just as bad as the "vaccines" or, for that matter, dental anesthetics. Plenty of things are present in plenty of things, and they can affect each other without any human being able to figure out how:
https://rayhorvaththesource.substack.com/p/what-is-in-where-and-why
Interesting read. Thoroughly enjoyed it. I do have a couple of questions though. How do we explain the runaway success that many antibody-based biologic therapies have demonstrated in inflammatory disorders like rheumatoid arthritis?! Similarly monoclonal antibodies have been developed for multiple targets Ib cancer pathogenesis. How do you explain these phenomena?! 🤔
Great question. From a terrain perspective, certain therapies and drugs—like so-called "monoclonal antibodies"—may reduce symptoms, but that doesn’t prove the disease was caused by the molecule being targeted, nor that the "antibody" is acting in the precise, targeted way that’s often claimed. Steroids also reduce inflammation, yet no one suggests they treat the root cause—they simply dampen symptoms. It's like turning off a fire alarm while the fire still burns: it may bring short-term relief, but it doesn't resolve why the dis-ease process was activated in the first place.
There’s also a logical error often overlooked in these discussions: assuming that because a treatment has an effect, it validates the causal theory behind it. That’s like saying aspirin curing a headache proves the headache was caused by an aspirin deficiency. Just because the use of a "monoclonal antibody" results in a reduction of inflammation in some doesn’t mean the body was malfunctioning due to a lack of that lab-engineered molecule—or that an immune “target” was the root cause of disease.
In the case of cancer, terrain theory would emphasize that malignancies arise not from rogue cells gone wild, but from a prolonged state of toxicity, malnourishment, emotional stress, and energetic imbalance in the body. The use of "monoclonal antibodies" may interfere with cell signaling or temporarily slow tumor growth, but this doesn’t mean the tumor was caused by an overexpressed protein or antigen. What’s being targeted may simply be a natural byproduct or adaptive expression of the tissue responding to a deteriorating internal environment. Disrupting these responses might lead to short-term changes, but unless the terrain is truly restored, the underlying imbalance remains—and often returns in different or more aggressive forms.
We also can’t discount the placebo effect, especially in subjective inflammatory conditions, or the body’s own adaptive responses to intervention, as reasons for perceived effectiveness. Regardless, many patients experience waning benefits or serious side effects over time. That’s entirely consistent with the terrain view: the root imbalance has not been corrected—only temporarily suppressed.
In other words, "antibody-based" biologics don’t prove the existence or behavior of "antibodies" as claimed. They function as high-tech symptom suppressors—just another way of chemically manipulating the terrain, not restoring it.
Well, at least we can rule out that these elusive, gyrating glycoproteins aren't shaped like an "O", but that still leaves about 21 letters to choose from which can schematically incorporate at least two identical bivalent binding sites:
A C E F G H I J K L M N R S T U V W X Y Z
So why did they choose "Y" in the first place?
My guess is a group of "scientists" blindfolded themselves and threw darts at an image of the alphabet. Whichever letter had the most darts at the end won. "Scientific consensus." 😉
Sorry for spelling errors, my spell check is not my friend.
No worries. I put my articles through multiple spellchecks and they always end up containing at least one error. 😅
hi mike! try to find me on Signal, i can't figure out how to find you! ;-)
Yes but did they give themselves away by showing the antibody with a disulfide bond? Isn’t that the perfect spot to introduce arsenic in one of its many forms into the body?
Hi Sammie0627,
That is a very interesting point. I know that arsenic has been used to poison people for quite some time, as was the case as when it was used as an old remedy for disease as well as when it was utilized as a pesticide. Are you thinking that arsenic is being used in "antibody" treatments?
Not necessarily but since the disulfide bond is where the body trades phosphate for arsenic it makes me suspicious. I’m not saying there is a disulfide bond but they did. It’s a little slip possibly. I just found that curious.
There’s an app that demonstrates the levels of arsine gas mixed with silica to help propel it downward, showing the measurement of arsine gas in the air at 3,000 feet. I learned of this from Boom Report which is on substate by Caroline Coreman. She repeated on these findings and using an app, Windy you can keep us when your area is under heavy spray. There is another app that I can’t recall the name because it’s German but I can find it if anyone is interested.
Caroline reports on England primarily but I set the app to monitor the US as well.
I’ve been researching the use of arsenic in its many forms for many years as I’ve had severe illness due to arsenic poisoning. It was a war to have my testing done to determine this but I knew intuitively that’s what was wrong. It’s the poison of kings and the king of poisons. These controllers are clever but they have limited items in their playbook. I believe it’s one of the toxins used to cause any illness they then define as a virus. There are many others but arsenic is colorless, odorless, slow to kill and causes all the usual symptoms of a virus. Pick a virus and you’ll find the symptoms of arsenic poisoning in one of its many forms.