Discover more from ViroLIEgy Newsletter
Planning the Next Pandemic
What "viral" fiction do we have to look forward to in the future?
If you have been paying attention over the last few years, you may have noticed a pattern emerge. Before these “epidemics” and “pandemics” simultaneously spread across the world, an event will take place with a gathering of the “who's who” of the medical industrial complex. These events are referred to as “exercises” and are said to be designed to simulate pandemic scenarios in order to facilitate discussions on how to prepare a response for any real-life outbreaks. It sounds innocent enough and somewhat logical to prepare for potential threats. However, once you realize that the threat being discussed has never been scientifically proven to exist and the people involved in these drills are the ones who have everything to gain from these “pandemics” continuing to take place, things begin to look a lot less innocent.
Take, for instance, Event 201 which was a tabletop exercise that explored the potential for a “SARS-like virus” running rampant across the world:
The Event 201 scenario
“Event 201 simulates an outbreak of a novel zoonotic coronavirus transmitted from bats to pigs to people that eventually becomes efficiently transmissible from person to person, leading to a severe pandemic. The pathogen and the disease it causes are modeled largely on SARS, but it is more transmissible in the community setting by people with mild symptoms.”
At first glance, it seems rather familiar to what we have seen over the last few years but knowing that we have encountered these “coronavirus” scenarios in the past, it may look only coincidental. However, when we find out that this event was a joint adventure between the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, the World Economic Forum, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, things start to look rather suspicious, especially as JHC was in charge of many of the statistics shared throughout the “pandemic” and the Gates Foundation was the second-largest financial contributor to the WHO and was heavily involved with the production of the mRNA vaccines. When we factor in that this “exercise” took place on October 18, 2019, a mere 6 weeks before the “SARS-COV-2” outbreak, alarm bells should be ringing.
Jumping forward to March 2021, the Nuclear Threat Initiative (NTI), a nonprofit group created in 2001 by Senator Sam Nunn and philanthropist Ted Turner, hosted a pandemic tabletop exercise aimed at reducing high-consequence biological threats.
“Developed in consultation with technical and policy experts, the fictional exercise scenario portrayed a deadly, global pandemic involving an unusual strain of monkeypox virus that first emerged in the fictional nation of Brinia and spread globally over 18 months. Ultimately, the exercise scenario revealed that the initial outbreak was caused by a terrorist attack using a pathogen engineered in a laboratory with inadequate biosafety and biosecurity provisions and weak oversight. By the end of the exercise, the fictional pandemic resulted in more than three billion cases and 270 million fatalities worldwide.”
From the NTI Wikipedia page, we learn that the group “serves as the Secretariat for the ‘Nuclear Security Project’, in cooperation with the Hoover Institution at Stanford. It is guided by former Secretary of State George P. Shultz, former Secretary of Defense William J. Perry, former Secretary of State Henry A. Kissinger and Nunn,” who are collectively known as the “four horsemen of the nuclear apocalypse.” A group intimately connected to men known as harbingers of the Apocalypse sounds rather ominous, yes? When we look to see who participated in this exercise, we once again see members of pharmaceutical companies, the Chinese and African CDC, the WHO, the Wellcome Trust, and the Gates Foundation.
Again, the major conflicts of interest in those “preparing” a response for events that they directly benefit and profit from should be a major red flag. However, there is yet another piece to this “exercise” that made it even more alarming. According to the NTI scenario, the outbreak was said to be of a monkeypox “virus” that was engineered in a lab that was able to escape vaccine protection. The predicted date that this fictional outbreak was said to occur was May 15th, 2022, just a little over a week after the “real” monkeypox outbreak began in the UK on May 7th, 2022. Coincidence? If you believe so, you haven't been paying attention.
On October 23rd, 2022, yet another tabletop “exercise” co-sponsored by the Johns Hopkins Center, the WHO, and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation took place. This event was known as “Catastrophic Contagion” and it was said to deal with the threat of a near-future pandemic more deadly than “Covid.”
“The Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security, in partnership with WHO and the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation, conducted Catastrophic Contagion, a pandemic tabletop exercise at the Grand Challenges Annual Meeting in Brussels, Belgium, on October 23, 2022.
The extraordinary group of participants consisted of 10 current and former Health Ministers and senior public health officials from Senegal, Rwanda, Nigeria, Angola, Liberia, Singapore, India, Germany, as well as Bill Gates, co-chair of the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation.
The exercise simulated a series of WHO emergency health advisory board meetings addressing a fictional pandemic set in the near future. Participants grappled with how to respond to an epidemic located in one part of the world that then spread rapidly, becoming a pandemic with a higher fatality rate than COVID-19 and disproportionately affecting children and young people.
Participants were challenged to make urgent policy decisions with limited information in the face of uncertainty. Each problem and choice had serious health, economic, and social ramifications.
Lessons from the exercise
Leaders must prepare now to make difficult, critically important decisions with limited information in the early days of the next pandemic in order to increase the chances that a dangerous outbreak can be contained at the source. In the early days of a major new contagious disease epidemic, there could be a brief window of opportunity to stop it from becoming a pandemic. To successfully contain such an outbreak, decisive and bold action would need to be taken in the face of incomplete data, high scientific uncertainty, and potential political resistance. Thinking through such challenges, preparing in advance to react effectively, and practicing through both high-level tabletop and operational exercises should start now.
It may seem like all these critical policy decisions have been resolved during the COVID-19 pandemic, but they have not. In the Catastrophic Contagion simulation, even a group of some of the wisest and most experienced international public health leaders who lived through COVID-19 wrestled with opposing views on whether countries should impose travel restrictions or close schools to try to contain a serious new epidemic that was disproportionately affecting children. The exercise raised a pivotal question: If future pandemics have a much higher lethality than COVID-19, or for example, if they affect predominantly children, would or should countries take different, stronger, earlier measures to contain it, and what are those measures?”
According to this scenario, a new “enterovirus,” given the name Severe Epidemic Enterovirus Respiratory Syndrome (SEERS), will break out in Brazil causing a severe and deadly respiratory disease affecting mostly young adults and children, the same group that just so happened to recently gain authorization for the toxic bivalent “Covid” booster shots.
Once again, we can see that the main players in this exercise are those from the very institutions (JHC, WHO, CDC, Gates) that benefit from the continuation of these “pandemics.” The people selling us the disease are the very ones preparing for ways to combat it through social and economic restrictions. They are also the ones selling us the “cures” for the diseases that they conjure up.
What comes from this latest “exercise” is yet to be seen. However, we can try to read the tea leaves left in some recent media reports to not only see how we are being primed for even more of these “pandemics” in the future but also where they may come from and what they could possibly consist of. Presented below is commentary, summaries, and highlights from two recent mainstream articles preparing us for the inevitable. Let's see what we can uncover.
In this first article from the popular fear propaganda rag USA Today, we are reminded that experts have been warning about the potential for a deadly worldwide pandemic for years. We have had mini-epidemics throughout the decades such as polio, HIV, swine flu, “SARS1,” avian flu, MERS, Ebola, zika, etc. These events were used as reminders to keep the threat of a deadly pandemic in the subconscious of the population so that we would take it seriously once the “real” event finally occurred. We have been regularly fed stories of so-called animal “viruses” jumping species to infect us. This made the wet-market selling exotic animal meat, smack-dab in the middle of the populous city of Wuhan, the perfect culprit for an outbreak to occur. Of course, we are reminded that the threat of a future pandemic remains a very “real” possibility and that, along with the fear of a new “virus” jumping species, we must also be terrified of the possibility of an accidental lab leak or an intentional biological terrorist attack. A pandemic brought about by any of these avenues is said to be far riskier for global security than conventional, nuclear or chemical warfare:
As COVID turns 3, experts worry where the next pandemic will come from – and if we'll be ready
“For years, public health experts warned of the possibility of an illness spreading across the globe killing millions. After all, it had happened before.
Measures were in place around the world to spot early signs of a never-before-seen bug with dangerous potential.
That's why on Dec. 31, 2019, China notified the World Health Organization that a novel pathogen was circulating in Wuhan, the most populous city in central China. A day later, in that city of 12 million, a wet market selling live animals was shuttered because of fears it was the source of the virus that would later be named SARS-CoV-2.
Three years later, the risk of a deadly pathogen spreading around the world remains.
Now, in addition to worrying about a virus that might jump from animals to humans, experts are concerned about research accidents and – what should be unthinkable – the possibility of someone intentionally unleashing a highly contagious and lethal pathogen.
A pandemic has long been known to be far riskier for global security than conventional, nuclear or chemical warfare, said Lawrence Gostin, a professor of public health law at Georgetown University and a leading expert in global health.
"We've seen that play out with COVID and COVID is far from the worst pandemic threat that we face," he said.
Setting the stage, the author next downplays the damage of “SARS-COV-2” by reminding us that there have been far deadlier pandemics in the past such as the 1918 flu and the Black Death. She then pitches us the scenario of a future threat of something far worse. Public health and national defense experts are said to be worried that the next pandemic will be far more destructive than what we faced over the last 3 years. Thus, whether the “virus” comes at us from nature, lab leak, or a terrorist attack, we must be prepared to fight this fictional entity. We are told that the most likely place for this entity to emerge is from nature, particularly from pigs or birds because we have been primed for such a scenario based on the smaller outbreaks of years past. However, if that seems too predictable, fret not as it is said that we face a multitude of threats from the lab leak and bioterrorism angle as well. We are reassured that, due to these various possibilities, we must be prepared for more frequent outbreaks and pandemics to occur:
Although it has so far killed more than 6.6 million people worldwide, other pandemics have been more lethal. The 1918 flu, for instance, is estimated to have cost 50 million lives across the globe, and in the 14th century, the Black Death killed between 30% and 60% of all Europeans in just four years.
Public health and national defense experts worry the next pandemic will come at an even higher price than this one. And the nation needs to be ready.
"It's incumbent on the United States and other countries to be prepared for whatever comes from biology, whether it's from nature or from engineering or a laboratory accident," said Dr. Tom Inglesby, director of the Johns Hopkins Center for Health Security at the Bloomberg School of Public Health.
The next pandemic could be worse
Gostin sees nature as the most likely source of the next pandemic. A highly lethal strain of bird or swine flu could mutate naturally to become contagious to humans. That scenario kept health experts like Gostin awake at night long before COVID-19.
But other causes are possible.
"We have a whole host of threats from lab leaks to bioterror to bioweapons to naturally occurring zoonotic spillovers," said Gostin, author of the 2021 book "Global Health Security: A Blueprint for the Future."
"All of that leads to quite a high probability that we're going to have more frequent pandemic-like threats and we need to take them seriously as a national security threat."
As is often the case, truth tends to spill out in these types of articles. On the potential of a man-made threat, the author rightfully states that engineering a deadly pathogen sounds like the stuff of science fiction or superhero movies. She then contends that it is no longer fantasy based upon the words of one Kevin Esvelt, an MIT biologist, who claimed that his own lab “could theoretically assemble a dangerous virus from DNA ordered on the internet for under $1,000.” One could theoretically do many things yet this does not mean it is possible to be able do so. However, we are told that thousands of people worldwide have the scientific training to engineer "viruses” from mail-ordered synthetic DNA that would be akin to creating a bomb. This is an obvious call-back to the anthrax-by-mail scares of the early 2000’s. These scare tactics fall apart when one realizes that in order to engineer a “virus,” the “virus” in question must be shown to exist as a physical entity found in the fluids of a sick host first (and then be proven pathogenic in a natural way) and not just exist as random A,C,T,G's in a computer database. This has never once been done.
Even though there is a treaty in place to stop such bioterrorism threats, it is suggested that secretive programs still take place. An example involving Russia attempting, and failing, to create a more deadly Ebola “virus” was used as evidence of this lack of oversight. We are also sold the idea that China and Iran have crossed the line as well, with Iran using a botulinum toxin that we apparently don't think is for Botox. Thus, we must fear Russia, China, and Iran as the most likely culprits to strike at us with a “viral” bioweapon just like the best James Bond movies tell us to do:
Manmade threats are real
“The idea of engineering a deadly pathogen that sickens the world sounds like the stuff of science fiction or superhero movies. But it's no longer a fantasy.
Kevin Esvelt, an MIT biologist, said people in his own lab could theoretically assemble a dangerous virus from DNA ordered on the internet for under $1,000.
Once pandemic-capable viruses are identified, thousands of people worldwide have the scientific training to make them from mail-ordered synthetic DNA.
"Imagine a world where you can order weapons-grade plutonium in the mail," he said, "and there are thousands of engineers who have the skills to put together something that might be a bomb."
The potential for bioterrorism
The global Biological Weapons Convention was enacted in March 1975 to prevent countries from ever developing or producing biological weapons. It has largely held ever since, though a few countries that signed onto the treaty are believed to have or have had secret programs.
The Soviets once tried to engineer Ebola into a more contagious pathogen, for instance, but it didn't work well, said Christine Parthemore, CEO of the Council on Strategic Risks, a nonprofit, nonpartisan security policy institute.
China and Iran may have come right up to the line, if not crossed it, making offensive weapons, she said. Based on U.S. government public assessments, for example, Iran may be using "botulinum toxin that we don't think is for Botox, at least not solely."
"The history is there," Parthemore said. "Countries have engineered pathogens."
We are told that the Defense Department initially became interested in mRNA vaccines as a way to counter state-based biological threats and engineered pathogens. The monkeypox vaccine was said to have been developed to counter a potentially deadlier version of smallpox. This smallpox threat was in the aftermath of 9/11 when we were supposed to feel threatened by potential terrorist attacks coming from anywhere. The bioterrorism narrative has been building up for awhile now. Ironically, the real terrorist threats are from the pharmaceutical companies creating the toxic vaccines which are the actual chemical agents being used as weapons against the citizenry.
Another factor used to sell this terrorism threat is that countries are putting up an increasing amount of biohazard level 4 facilities to study deadly pathogens. The labs are said to lack oversight and we are told that these facilities are exactly where a country would engineer a dangerous “virus” to be used as a weapon, cementing in the mind of the fearful readers that a threat is most likely to emerge from any one of these locations. If that information (reminiscent of the invisible weapons of mass destruction in Iraq) didn't frighten you enough, we are left with the idea that materials to create a pathogen are easy to get ahold of and the companies selling these materials are not required to screen for bad actors who may be looking for dangerous DNA sequences:
The Defense Department initially became interested in mRNA vaccines, which were used to fight COVID-19, as a rapid way to counter state-based biological threats and engineered pathogens, she said.
And the vaccine that proved effective this summer against mpox (formerly known as monkeypox) was developed to counter the possibility that someone might try to unleash it's deadlier cousin smallpox on the world.”
“The construction of new biosafety labs also has raised concerns among experts.
Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, more than a dozen countries have announced plans to build Level 4 labs, the highest level of security, designed to investigate the most dangerous pathogens.
These labs lack strong international oversight, Parthemore said. "Obviously, if you had an offensive program and you were trying to engineer pathogens in certain ways, a BSL-4 laboratory is where you would do the work," she said. "The lack of transparency in these labs and their proliferation is a huge problem."
It's also too easy to order the building blocks of a pathogen on the internet, Yassif said. Some companies screen orders to make sure they're not selling dangerous DNA sequences to bad actors, but they're not required to do so. "There's probably a sizeable market share that's not being screened and we're trying to close that gap," she said.”
If I were to make a prediction of what the future “pandemic” has in store for us based upon this one article, my money is on the lab leak/bioweapons angle. Of course, they could play coy like they are doing with “SARS-COV-2” and let the mysterious origin remain unresolved. However, it is clear that a lot of effort has been put into making the population fear the potential of a bioterrorism attack just as nuclear fallout was feared during the Cold War era. The bioweapon angle would be a logical avenue for them to explore now that this idea has been successfully downloaded and installed into the terrified brains of the masses throughout the last two decades. It also makes for a good excuse to invade whatever country “The Powers That Be” want to gain access to and destabilize next.
So which potential pathogen will be the future star? Most likely, if it is a bioterrorism attack narrative, they will stay away from a novel “virus” and use a known “virus” that was engineered into a more pathogenic strain to keep the genomic lie afloat. They may even claim to combine different “viruses” as was hinted at with “SARS-COV-2” and HIV. Unless there is some sort of known reaction or long-term side-effect that is expected from the vaccines and boosters, it will continue to be a respiratory “virus” as these symptoms are common year-round now with the increased air pollution we are subjected to on a daily basis. The only way I could see an attempt at something like Ebola is if the symptomology is tweaked to lean away from hemorrhagic fever which is not a common reaction around the industrialized world, especially the severe bleeding associated with it. However, the treatments used for Ebola do produce this hemorrhagic reaction so it is possible that they could use the common non-specific symptoms related to Ebola as a way to scare people into testing and then use the toxic treatments to create the hemorrhagic fever/bleeding necessary to sell the narrative of the spread of the “virus.” However, it is most likely that one of the 200+ respiratory “viruses” currently waiting to be plucked back out from obscurity will be used to frighten the ready and willing populace. I’m looking at you “adenovirus.”
As I stated earlier, throughout the decades, we have been primed for the emergence of a worldwide pandemic through the use of mini-epidemics. While these “outbreaks” were less frequent in the past, they are now striking with a vicious ferocity where we are witnessing multiple reports of “viral” threats within a year. To examine this a bit further, let's take a look from a second article which comes from The Insider. It takes us on a trip down memory lane by exploring some of the recent “viral” and bacterial boogeymen that have been used against us in 2022. We may even get a hint as to what to expect coming up.
8 infectious diseases that made a comeback in 2022 unexpectedly — and illnesses that could surge in 2023
Polio re-emerged in the UK and the US after nearly a decade of no cases, paralyzing at least one unvaccinated New Yorker.
Polio is a disease that I have covered quite extensively on viroLIEgy.com. I also recently wrote about this recent poo-lio fiasco here on Substack so I won’t comment too much. Unlike what this article wants us to believe, the unvaccinated are not spreading polio. Polio can never be eradicated by way of vaccination as the symptoms are of a body that has been poisoned and damaged neurologically. The very vaccines used in prevention of polio are said to cause the exact same disease in the recipients. This is known as vaccine-induced polio. The only way to eradicate polio is the same way that smallpox was “eradicated” in the early 1980's which is to stop using the name and to put the symptoms under a new name and label. However, they want us to believe that the unvaccinated are currently spreading a “virus” supposedly confined to Pakistan and India by way of international travel. Meanwhile, the majority of polio cases today are considered vaccine-derived. To anyone looking at this logically, it is easy to see that it is not the unvaccinated but the vaccine which is “spreading” the disease through injury.
Polio, a deadly virus that used to disable hundreds of thousands of children a year in the early 20th century, only circulates in Pakistan and Afghanistan these days, thanks to near-universal vaccination that extends to almost every corner of the world.
Health workers and security guards in those two countries still risk their lives and are routinely gunned down traveling to remote areas and battling outlandish anti-vaccine conspiracy theories to deliver oral polio vaccines to children.
"If we do not manage to eradicate polio, it is not going to stay in Pakistan, Afghanistan — it will always come out," Oliver Rosenbauer, a communications officer with the World Health Organization's Global Polio Eradication Initiative, recently told Insider, alluding to the modern pace of global travel and how infectious diseases spread irrespective of borders.
"Countries will always run the risk of being reinfected, and that is what we're seeing with New York and London," where unvaccinated people now run the risk of infection and paralysis," Rosenbauer added.
"That's one thing that keeps surprising me, actually, is how good this virus is at finding unvaccinated individuals."
He expects polio "will continue to spread" until the virus is eliminated.
"The goal of achieving a polio-free world is not going to be won or lost in New York or London, it's going to be won or lost in Pakistan," he said.
Scarlet fever killed at least 25 children in the UK, who had a nasty version of strep.
My latest article here touched on Strep A and Scarlet fever, yet another situation where a bacterium is linked to a symptom without any actual evidence it was ever the cause in the first place. While the mainstream media hypes up the threat of Strep A, no deaths have been linked to this current “hefty” rise in cases.
In the US, too, cases of invasive group A strep, the infection that causes scarlet fever, are up according to the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention — but no deaths have been recorded stateside.
Fortunately, group A strep is a bacterial illness, which means it can be easily treated with one of many different antibiotics, including amoxicillin or cephalexin.
Dr. Anthony Flores, chief of pediatric infectious diseases with Memorial Hermann Hospital and UTHealth Houston, recently told Insider that "we still have a long winter respiratory virus season to go," so it's likely that the hefty load of strep cases we're seeing now could continue into the first months of 2023.
Measles is spreading fast among unvaccinated children in Ohio — at least 32 have been hospitalized.
Of course, you had to know measles would pop up on this list, especially with the current push to vaccinate for anything and everything while blaming those smart enough to avoid such measures for any apparent rise in cases. Measles has been a grenade lobbed at anti-vaxxers for years, especially after the MMR link to autism was exposed in the late 1990's and informed parents wised up to the scam and stopped vaccinating their children. Sadly the Somali, Amish, and Orthodox Jewish communities get the brunt of the anger and attacks directed at them. This latest push is to try and frighten parents who became leery of the toxic practice during this “pandemic” back onto the vaccination train. The unvaccinated will get the blame for a disease that will rarely be diagnosed as measles in the vaccinated population because the doctor will assume it is instead one of the many other diseases associated with the same symptoms due to the child's vaccination status. We are told to fear this highly contagious “virus” which will spread if the vaccination coverage drops ever so slightly, thus the current fear propaganda to increase falling rates.
No measles deaths have been reported in Ohio this year, but 82 measles cases have been recorded, and nearly half of those patients (32) were hospitalized.
So far, only unvaccinated kids have been infected (though four patients have an "unknown" vaccination status.) The CDC says measles vaccine coverage has "steadily declined since the beginning of the COVID-19 pandemic," both in the US, and around the globe.
In Minnesota, a few states further west, at least 22 measles infections have been recorded in 2022 — after three years of no cases — all in families with unvaccinated children. Seven of those patients have been hospitalized.
Because measles is one of the most contagious viruses humans get, "even a small drop in the immunization coverage rate means there are thousands more children who could be vulnerable to disease," Jennifer Heath, the immunizations program coordinator for the Minnesota Department of Health, said in September.
Heath recently told the Washington Post that a big part of the reason why more parents are shifting their stance on routine MMR vaccines for their kids is because of "a disconnection to the primary care provider — the human being who's telling you that vaccines are important."
The World Health Organization and UNICEF say a "perfect storm" has been brewing for more measles outbreaks around the world, spurred on by both pandemic declines in vaccination, and more vaccine hesitancy. Disease experts expect areas of the world without 95% of their population vaccinated against measles may see more outbreaks in 2023.
Mpox, a virus which had rarely spread outside of endemic countries in central and west Africa before, roared across the globe, with thousands of infections diagnosed across six continents.
Speaking of one of the diseases that measles can be diagnosed as instead in vaccinated children, I have written extensively on the fraud of monkeypox. One of my first Substack articles looked at potential causes for these same symptoms of disease appearing randomly across the world. This latest push was to create the impression that a “virus” can, at any moment, start acting “out-of-the-ordinary” and infect people who had no history of travel to endemic areas. It also showed that “viruses” can discriminate against people based on their sexual preferences. It was used to push the narrative that vaccination, treatments, and community action can cause the retreat of the “virus” rather than the more obvious conclusion that fear abating over time led to a decrease in testing for the “virus.”
In a span of less than six months starting in May, more than 83,500 cases were confirmed, and at least 25 people died worldwide.
The virus, which was called monkeypox before the World Health Organization recently renamed it, appears to be in retreat, after layered interventions including vaccines, treatments, and community prevention measures were quickly adopted and embraced.
After surveying more than 800 men who had sex with men, the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention found around 48% reported reducing their number of sexual partners over the summer of 2022, when the outbreak was peaking, and 50% said they slowed down on one-off "sexual encounters."
"Given the low number of cases today, HHS does not expect that it needs to renew the emergency declaration when it ends on January 31, 2023," US Health Secretary Xavier Becerra announced December 2.
Babies and toddlers have been bearing the brunt of a nasty respiratory illness season, with skyrocketing cases of RSV, parechovirus, and other infectious diseases.
According to mainstream stooges like Dr. William Schaffner, we are to believe that the extreme measures used to fight “Covid” were so effective that children were never exposed to other common “viruses” and lost immunity to them. Now, “respiratory viruses” such as “influenza” and “RSV” are said to be making a strong comeback. At least Dr. Flores admitted that this “viral” merry-go-round occurs every respiratory season. Perhaps this is a regular occurrence due to the fact that these symptoms of the common seasonal detox will never go away and will be continually relabelled as different diseases caused by different “viruses.” Expect whatever comes next to be from this group of 200+ “viruses.”
Doctors, nurses, and epidemiologists say there are several things at play contributing to the big viral soup — and they are wary of dismissing it with any one simple explanation, like a so-called "immunity debt" spawned by social isolation during the COVID-19 pandemic.
Dr. William Schaffner, a professor of preventive medicine at Vanderbilt University Medical Center, says there is more of an "exposure debt" at work, not an immunity debt, meaning lots of kids who didn't get many common childhood illnesses for two years are all getting infected with them now.
"Childrens' immune systems are just fine," Schaffner said during a recent Infectious Diseases Society of America press briefing. "Now that they're exposed, they're having to deal with this virus, and the virus has many more opportunities to spread."
"It happens every respiratory virus season," Dr.Flores said. "But this season has been a little more intense."
Infectious disease experts like Flores are notoriously wary of making specific predictions about what seasonal viruses will do in 2023, but it's likely we'll continue to see more wintery illnesses popping up over at least the next few months. Most viral illness, including flu and RSV, peak annually between December and February.
Flores also said drug shortages for medicines like children's Tylenol and amoxicillin could last until the spring.
An out-of-nowhere outbreak of Cholera has killed more than 280 people in Haiti.
Here we find cholera, the bacterial disease that fails to meet 3 out of 4 of Koch's Postulates required to be fulfilled in order to prove a causative role in disease. In this case, the vibrio cholera bacteria is regularly found in healthy hosts as well as not found in cases of the disease and Koch could not sicken animals nor himself experimentally. We are to believe that the current outbreak is due to a descendant of a strain from over a decade ago brought by UN troops. Interestingly, the WHO admits that this rise in cases is due to a lack of clean drinking water brought about by flooding, conflict, migration, and “other factors” thus there is no need to point the finger at a bacterium as the cause. Of course, this has led to an increased call for vaccination efforts in these populations which will ultimately lead to more disease.
For the first time in three years, cholera is spreading in Haiti, with at least 13,672 cases and 283 deaths recorded since early October.
Insider's Sarah Braner reported it's possible that the currently circulating strain may be a descendant of one brought into the country over a decade ago by UN troops providing earthquake disaster relief.
Cholera is also on the rise this year in Syria, Malawi, and more than 25 other countries, a global increase prompted by more flooding, conflict, migration, and "other factors that limit access to clean water," the World Health Organization said in a recent dispatch.
A group of concerned doctors wrote in the New England Journal of Medicine last week that this "resurgence of cholera in several parts of the world despite available tools to fight it" means "cholera control and prevention efforts must be redoubled," with the WHO specifying that "urgent action is needed to increase global vaccine production."
Though disease experts can't yet say for sure what the cholera situation will be in 2023, cholera vaccines are being rationed — to one dose per person, instead of the usual two — in order to provide more people with "protection in the near term, should the global cholera situation continue deteriorating," the WHO said.
More than three years in, COVID-19 is continuing to infect and kill millions of people — with various versions of Omicron dominating, for now.
Sound the alarms! Experts expect anywhere from 500,000 to 1.8 million people to die from “Covid” in China because the country made the rash decision to drop its “Zero Tolerance” policy. That doesn't sound like fear-mongering scare tactics, does it? It's not like the experts and their models were wrong before. These same experts are worried about the “possibility that the virus could morph again into another new variant that could potentially circumvent current vaccines or treatment options,” which is the perfect escape clause for the continued ineffectiveness of the vaccines and treatments. Regardless, Moderna and Pfizer have their ineffective boosters available for anyone dumb enough to continue falling for the same trick over and over again. It is clear that “Covid” won't be going away anytime soon.
Disease experts expect anywhere between 500,000 and 1.8 million people in China will die from COVID-19 by the end of April 2023, as the country quickly disbands its longstanding "zero-COVID" policy, in the face of widespread citizen protests.
For now, the coronavirus variants that are circulating in China, the US, and elsewhere are almost all some version of Omicron, but federal health officials in the US are worried about the possibility that the virus could morph again into another new variant that could potentially circumvent current vaccines or treatment options, as millions more people will continue to get infected in the new year.
Updated booster shots from Moderna and Pfizer fight back against Omicron specifically, and help stave off severe disease and death. The US has offered some of its vaccines to China, but the country has instead focused on trialing its own booster shots. While China's overall COVID-19 vaccination rate is above 90%, only about two-thirds of the elderly adults over age 80 in China, who are by far the most vulnerable to severe disease and death from the disease, have been vaccinated.
Putting everything together, it is clear that the very people, organizations, and institutions that gain and profit from these continued “pandemics” are the very ones directly involved with planning (for) them. We continue to witness eerily accurate predictions from the people who promote the disease and sell the “cure.” We see the mainstream media continue to push fear-based propaganda of the potential lab leak or engineered bioweapon attack, preparing us for this scenario to take place in the not-too-distant future. We have been primed throughout the decades with mini-epidemics to get us to accept that these outbreaks can occur at any time and from anywhere, whether jumping from animals or lab to man. We are told that, despite spending massive amounts of money on vaccinations and treatments intended to prevent these outbreaks, they will become more frequent going forward. We can easily see this to be the case with the numerous headlines generated throughout 2022 focusing on the next threat while the last one was still in its infancy.
While this may not be a groundbreaking prediction, it seems clear to me that the next time that they attempt something on the scale of “Covid,” it will once again be one of the 200+ respiratory “viruses” waiting in the wings like “adenovirus” or the rampaging “rhinovirus.” It will most likely be claimed to be an enhanced engineered bioweapon stemming from any of the biohazard level 4 facilities currently popping up. Granted, they could easily claim that someone engineered the “virus” on their own from products ordered through the mail, but this seems unlikely to me. My guess is that we may not see this scenario for a few years as pandemic fatigue has set in. In the meantime, they will continue to prop up “Covid” variants to keep the “emergency” going so that the vaccines/treatments do not lose authorization. We will continue to see mini-epidemics pop up, to not only remind us of the constant need to be afraid, but also to cover up the toxic side effects from the vaccines, treatments, and increased exposure to environmental pollution.
So while the planners plan and prepare us for the inevitable future “viral threat,” what can we do to stop this sick-cycle from repeating itself? We must remain vigilant and continue to fight back with even more intensity than ever before. I've often been asked why I keep attacking this “virus” issue. Why do I devote so much time and energy in trying to raise awareness to the “viral” fraud? My response is always this: if we don't stop this lie now, it will be used against us again and again with increasingly higher costs each and every time. The population has been successfully conditioned to give up rights and freedoms over the same symptoms of disease we see every year. Measures were pushed as far as they could comfortably go until resistance occurred, which led to the inevitable backing off. However, now that these measures have been accepted as an inconvenient but acceptable response to a “viral” threat, this card is in the back pocket to be played once again any time it is desired. What happens when the threat is considered far more dangerous based on modeling and statistics? What if, instead of our elderly, it is our children who are threatened next as the “Catastrophic Contagion” exercise predicts? What kind of rights will people willingly give away in order to protect the young from the invisible boogeyman? What kind of backlash will fall upon those resisting this madness? It is imperative that we raise our voices as loudly as we can and make our presence felt on as many social media platforms as possible. We must inform the unaware whether through blogs, videos, and podcasts. We must highlight the unscientific genomic evidence by poring through the research and taking it apart piece-by-piece so that they can not use this to conjure up the next in silico threat. We must find ways to advertise the truth whether through t-shirts, bumper stickers, posters, etc. We must engage with the community in every way possible and spread awareness, whether in person or in chat rooms. If we don't stop this insanity right now, in this very moment, we never will and it will be our children who ultimately pay the price for our failures. While those in power are planning the next “pandemic,” we must push even harder to tear this house of cards down for all to see.recently wrote a published article that I highly recommended reading for the Swedish scientific journal called 3rd Millenium Science. continues to attack the so-called health institutions through FOI's and put RFK Jr. and CHD on notice for their unscientific positions. put together a wonderful compilation of highlights from her interviews with some very important voices in the "No virus” movement over the year.