22 Comments

At some point they will start selling the "all viruses are good, we depend on them, they are symbionts, sorry about vaccines all these years, haha"

The ultimate form of damage control: admit everything and blame death scientists from the 20th century.

But the system works and the agencies regulating scientific research are not corrupt at all.

Expand full comment
Apr 7, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

Wow!! One of the best articles that I've read (aside from the amazing Dr. Sam Bailey) that exposes the contradictions (lies/falsehoods) of isolation and purification of "viruses".... As an RN - it's taken me a while to come around on this topic given how we are "educated" and conditioned (brain washed) into believing the established germ theory narrative - but I think I'm finally there.. Thanks so much Mike for this very well written explanation!

Expand full comment

Great article, Mike. Truly excellent. The criminal fraud known as virology is inexorably entwined with its blood brother in murder and mayhem, vaccinations. Together, globally, they reap a trillion dollar market in pain, suffering and death, especially when you factor in all of the poisonous pharmaceuticals prescribed to people ill from the destructive vaccines. Dr. Sam Bailey noted that nothing will get you banned faster from any mainstream platform or site than if you question and expose the lies of viruses and vaccines. The people who push and administer this evil fraud and the ones in the shadows who have planned and directed it are sub-human monsters and should be dealt with accordingly.

Expand full comment
Apr 1, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

Great post- this is the final nail in the coffin for viroLIEgy.

If our cells are so busy replicating hundreds of trillions of viruses, then how do they have the bandwidth to replicate ourselves?! 🤣

Expand full comment
Apr 4, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

I'd like to see virologists try and explain how a fit for purpose cell culture method can be designed. There are such a huge number of claimed viral particles in living tissue. How can a cell culture method be engineered to only propagate the claimed target virus species ?

Expand full comment
Apr 7, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

One thing I haven't seen addressed, by "virologists," "virus denial de-bunkers," nor any of the no-virus crew: Why do virology researchers incubate their cell cultures in an environment of 5% CO2? I now look for this when I read one of those "virus isolation" papers. The cell culture brew, if it is incubated, is usually incubated at 37 degrees Celsius (logical--that's human body temp), with 5% co2. The latter is NOT logical, since the earth's atmosphere is less than 1/10th of that. Have you investigated this, Mike?

Expand full comment
Apr 12, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

Are we able to print your newsletters to share? I have older peeps that don’t do the internet if you can believe that.

Expand full comment

Mike. Can't thank you enough for your tireless efforts. Your stuff is the gold standard for refuting these charlatans, which seem to be everywhere.

On another (unnamed) Substack site which I regularly visit and comment at (mostly about the lack of evidence of the existence of viruses), I was recently countered with a link to this paper: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41467-022-29255-y#Sec11. Was wondering if I could get your assistance is analyzing that paper for proof of virus "isolates," which is referenced throughout.

In the Methods section, it states that "nasal brushing samples were taken from a healthy 25-year-old female, and a SARS-CoV-2 infected 61-year-old male participant turbinates using 3-mm bronchial cytology brushes. SARS-CoV-2 infection was PCR-confirmed from swabs." Note that it seems to assume "infection" in the second sample. Also states that the "nasal brushings were placed in PneumaCult-Ex Plus medium and cells dissociated from the brush by gentle agitation. The cells were seeded into a single well of collagen coated plate and once confluent, the cells were passaged and expanded further in a T25 flask. The cells were passaged a second time and seeded onto transwell inserts at a density of 24,000 cells per insert. Cells were cultured in PneumaCult-Ex Plus medium until confluent, at which point the media was replaced with PneumaCult-ALI medium in the basal chamber and the apical surface exposed to provide an air-liquid interface (ALI). Ciliation was observed between 4–6 weeks post transition to ALI." Is any of their use of cell culture media (and other manipulation) ultimately valid -- i.e., for claims of having obtained virus "isolates"?

Expand full comment

Two words that do not appear on this lengthy article; "contagious" and "gain" as in "gain of function". Billions of $$ have been spent on gain of function research. Function of what? Also what makes people in close proximity become ill with similar symptoms? I am no scientist but I have been on Earth for 73 years and seen plenty of flu going around as the say. I had Mumps, Chicken Pox, Measles. I traveled with a band that all got sick at the same time. How can you categorically deny the existence of viruses and not offer some alternative explanation of common observation?

Expand full comment

It's rather obvious the issue is not viral,,,, but something was making people sick and killing people,,, take a look at the papers detailing the venom in Italy's postmortem. It's all online. Someone was poisoning these people with many kinds of venoms. Check out Dr. Bryan Ardis online. Was it put in the water?

Expand full comment