Dear Mike, have you ever thought of publishing ALL your substack written work so far in a book in the near future? You might need two volumes but please think about it. Your research needs to exist in books for students and people, and to pass them to next generations. Thanx.
I'm actually in the process of writing a book right now. Much of the information from these last two articles came from the research I have been doing for a few chapters in the book. While I could easily just compile my past articles into a collection, I'm trying to put it all into a historical narrative. Hopefully, it will turn out. 🙂
I agree with you Eva. Mike's past articles will enable us to show proof easier to others, and it will be a great book for us to read and learn again all of Mike's valuable information. And a printed book can't be censored. You have already bought it, it is in your physical library.
-does koch postulates refer mainly to bacteria? Not viruses?
-Virus identification is different as it used to be grown/filtered etc …. then compared to others with same characteristics? Viruses can’t be isolated but instead using process to compare to other characteristics?
-nowadays viruses are identified with rna etc. same thing… comparing like characteristics ?
Can you give a short laymen’s explanation ? Or it’s impossible? Just wondering as then I can share info to people I know with help on topic.
What did the 'boy in the bubble' need protection from? They worried that the boy "had no immune system" and would get sick if he was outside the bubble.
He died at 12 from lymphoma, and they blamed that on an Epstein-Barr virus delivered via bone marrow transplant. Any comments?
I haven't specifically looked into the bubble boy case. I did see some old experiments where they took newborn guinea pigs and kept them in a completely sterile environment from birth. They died within weeks if I remember correctly. Basically, it showed that a completely sterile environment is harmful. I'll see if I can find the study.
Thanks for this, Mike; I've been looking for a concise expose on why germ theory is wrong.
Speaking of tuberculosis, have you done any digging into the "old" treatment for TB, the sanatoriums? I was reading a book in which a character in the early 1900s is diagnosed with the disease, and goes to a sanatorium, essentially to die more comfortably. I had been under the impression that those institutions often effected actual cures, but were expensive so that only fairly wealthy people could afford them, and the poor just died--or if they somehow could go to a sanitorium, when they went back to their usual living conditions, the TB came back.
However, Mr Google didn't have any information on that. I could only find articles saying that antibiotics replaced their use. Do you have anything about effective treatments for TB in any of your writings?
From what I have gathered, Jeff is a disciple of Aajonus Vonderplanitz and believes that "viruses" exist, not as pathogens, but as soaps/solvents within the body. Thus, while he agrees with the "No Virus" position on there being no pathogenic "viruses," he disagrees about their existence and the methods used to prove them such as cell culturing, EM imagery, antibody results, and genomic sequencing.
From my interactions with Jeff, as well as from those I have witnessed from others, he is a very intellectually dishonest person. He relies upon the same pseudoscience to create his own stories about what "viruses" are and how the body works. He attacks those who are calling out virology and the existence of "viruses" rather than those who promote fear around what he believes are non-pathogenic entities. At best, Jeff is misguided. At worst, he is trying to disrupt those speaking out against virology.
In my opinion, Jeff wants attention and he is trying to get me to respond to his pointless diatribes in order to get it. I won't engage with him any longer. He can remain irrelevant.
I, and another woman were blocked by Jeff as soon as we showed we did not support his ideas. IOW, he won't allow any real discussion. If you have a min you can see our replies to him as he left our comments there to show the world how BAD we are. Cheers!
Jeff just wants an echo chamber of people who agree with him. He did a post about banning "No Virus Shills" (presumably about his interaction with you and others) and laid out his guidelines to comment on his posts without being banned.
"Comment Guidelines:
If you hold a contrary viewpoint:
You must support your claims with well-founded evidence.
You must engage in the discussion in good faith, recognizing the principles of constructive debate.
You must refrain from personal attacks, misrepresentation of viewpoints, and misrepresentation of scientific information, or gross mischaracterization.
You must acknowledge and consider the evidence that has been presented, rather than disregarding it outright.
You must not engage in dishonest or deceptive intent.
If you believe the Earth is flat, you will be banned.
If individuals fail to adhere to these guidelines, their commenting privileges will be revoked."
As Jeff engages in similar actions to that which he opposes, perhaps he should ban himself. 🤔
Dear Mike, have you ever thought of publishing ALL your substack written work so far in a book in the near future? You might need two volumes but please think about it. Your research needs to exist in books for students and people, and to pass them to next generations. Thanx.
Hi Nick,
I'm actually in the process of writing a book right now. Much of the information from these last two articles came from the research I have been doing for a few chapters in the book. While I could easily just compile my past articles into a collection, I'm trying to put it all into a historical narrative. Hopefully, it will turn out. 🙂
You can do both and have two books published. The one you are writing now AND a compile of all your past articles. But you know best :)
I would buy any and all future books written by Mike. I love the idea of a book as a collection of all his past articles.
I agree with you Eva. Mike's past articles will enable us to show proof easier to others, and it will be a great book for us to read and learn again all of Mike's valuable information. And a printed book can't be censored. You have already bought it, it is in your physical library.
Gosh. Excellent information.
I need help though…..
-does koch postulates refer mainly to bacteria? Not viruses?
-Virus identification is different as it used to be grown/filtered etc …. then compared to others with same characteristics? Viruses can’t be isolated but instead using process to compare to other characteristics?
-nowadays viruses are identified with rna etc. same thing… comparing like characteristics ?
Can you give a short laymen’s explanation ? Or it’s impossible? Just wondering as then I can share info to people I know with help on topic.
Thanks!!!!
I did an article on Koch's Postulates recently that may be helpful:
https://viroliegy.com/2024/01/26/viroliegy-101-kochs-postulates/
Beyond that, this Intro to ViroLIEgy article may be helpful in breaking it down as well:
https://viroliegy.com/2022/04/26/introduction-to-viroliegy/
I’m trying to absorb all this ..
1.. the PCR tests can pick up anything & are mis-used
2. . CDC science say we all are born with “cancer cells” .
3. ..new AI 🤖 healthcare will be able to cut out cancer & all other diseases
4. - but if everyone has dormant cancer cells, that means everyone will get treatment,
5. Conclusions… its a scam treatment that does something else, like the jab & nano tech 🤷♀️
-
Mike,
What did the 'boy in the bubble' need protection from? They worried that the boy "had no immune system" and would get sick if he was outside the bubble.
He died at 12 from lymphoma, and they blamed that on an Epstein-Barr virus delivered via bone marrow transplant. Any comments?
Thanks for your great work.
Gerald Brennan
Hi Gerald,
I haven't specifically looked into the bubble boy case. I did see some old experiments where they took newborn guinea pigs and kept them in a completely sterile environment from birth. They died within weeks if I remember correctly. Basically, it showed that a completely sterile environment is harmful. I'll see if I can find the study.
Nice work!
Thanks! 😁
Using google translate, you’ll learn that the Latin phrase “sci enti fic” is “know that it is fiction” in English.
Coincidence or not?
Mike, are you aware that the Rinderpest was also claimed to be a virus in cloven hoof animals being Ruminants, but they say it has been eradicated?
Morens DM, Holmes EC, Davis AS, Taubenberger JK. Global rinderpest eradication: lessons learned and why humans should celebrate too. J Infect Dis. 2011 Aug 15;204(4):502-5. doi: 10.1093/infdis/jir327. Epub 2011 Jun 7. PMID: 21653230; PMCID: PMC3144172.
Thanks for this, Mike; I've been looking for a concise expose on why germ theory is wrong.
Speaking of tuberculosis, have you done any digging into the "old" treatment for TB, the sanatoriums? I was reading a book in which a character in the early 1900s is diagnosed with the disease, and goes to a sanatorium, essentially to die more comfortably. I had been under the impression that those institutions often effected actual cures, but were expensive so that only fairly wealthy people could afford them, and the poor just died--or if they somehow could go to a sanitorium, when they went back to their usual living conditions, the TB came back.
However, Mr Google didn't have any information on that. I could only find articles saying that antibiotics replaced their use. Do you have anything about effective treatments for TB in any of your writings?
Who is this guy Jeff Green who is podcasting against you?
https://jeffgreenhealth.substack.com/p/podcast-correcting-no-virus-falsehoods
Hi Greg,
From what I have gathered, Jeff is a disciple of Aajonus Vonderplanitz and believes that "viruses" exist, not as pathogens, but as soaps/solvents within the body. Thus, while he agrees with the "No Virus" position on there being no pathogenic "viruses," he disagrees about their existence and the methods used to prove them such as cell culturing, EM imagery, antibody results, and genomic sequencing.
From my interactions with Jeff, as well as from those I have witnessed from others, he is a very intellectually dishonest person. He relies upon the same pseudoscience to create his own stories about what "viruses" are and how the body works. He attacks those who are calling out virology and the existence of "viruses" rather than those who promote fear around what he believes are non-pathogenic entities. At best, Jeff is misguided. At worst, he is trying to disrupt those speaking out against virology.
In my opinion, Jeff wants attention and he is trying to get me to respond to his pointless diatribes in order to get it. I won't engage with him any longer. He can remain irrelevant.
I, and another woman were blocked by Jeff as soon as we showed we did not support his ideas. IOW, he won't allow any real discussion. If you have a min you can see our replies to him as he left our comments there to show the world how BAD we are. Cheers!
Jeff just wants an echo chamber of people who agree with him. He did a post about banning "No Virus Shills" (presumably about his interaction with you and others) and laid out his guidelines to comment on his posts without being banned.
"Comment Guidelines:
If you hold a contrary viewpoint:
You must support your claims with well-founded evidence.
You must engage in the discussion in good faith, recognizing the principles of constructive debate.
You must refrain from personal attacks, misrepresentation of viewpoints, and misrepresentation of scientific information, or gross mischaracterization.
You must acknowledge and consider the evidence that has been presented, rather than disregarding it outright.
You must not engage in dishonest or deceptive intent.
If you believe the Earth is flat, you will be banned.
If individuals fail to adhere to these guidelines, their commenting privileges will be revoked."
As Jeff engages in similar actions to that which he opposes, perhaps he should ban himself. 🤔
I honed my discernment skills trying to disprove flat earth…I could not. Ended up with zero evidence for the globe…ha!
Your final sentence is exactly what I so much as told him. I guess my work there is done. Heh heh.