So totally brilliant, can't wait to get my hands on that book. Mike stone I've READ ALL your latest on covid viruses etc etc followed along meticulously and kept up. A BIG THANK YOU, FOR REALLY OPENING MY EYES and others
So Prof Tim Noakes is a 'renowned (I always mistrust anyone who is given this adjective) nutritionist (he has written books but has no nutrition qualification I can see) and sports scientist' is he?
He reminds me of psychologist Jordan B Peterson. Really slimy. But on a more objective and scientific note; they both moan that they're being censored by the establishment (while both being totally pro-establishment and pro-industry) when they are in fact being censured by their professional bodies, rightly, for professional misconduct. This involves being rude about people with poor mental health in JP’s case and in giving direct internet advice, not allowed for anything let alone unevidenced and potentially harmful neonatal nutrition for which they are not qualified, in TN’s case. They can't do these things under the terms of their registration nor keep their professional status if they do so. No one is trying to censor them.
And I'm still pissed at the Baileys for blocking me for not wanting to discuss the errors in their logic over the farming of animals. Or perhaps they didn’t like me pointing out what they say about evil globalist henchman YNH shows they haven't done their research properly, or at all. Disagreement is helpful and the point of science, and substack.
I’ve read several books refuting germ theory and I get what the Baileys are saying. However, I’m not “there” yet. I have long taken personal responsibility for my health and try to avoid the allopathic care system. My perception is that the proponents of terrain theory feel it is sufficient to demonstrate lack of proof of viruses, yet don’t offer alternatives. Like defense attorneys who only need to disprove evidence against their client without having to prove who actually committed the crime.
HUGE THANKS!! GREATLY APPRECIATED!! THIS is another arrow I can use on comments frontline war against those peddling the virus lie. Meryl Nass being a chief culprit. LOL 😄 Had a guy say that the mRNA does what it says on the label and that ribosomes are involved. Do you know anyone who has done a take down of that claim? Your website is AMAZING!! HUGE THANKS!!
It would be good journalistic practice to ask whether renowned low carb high fat 'nutritionist' Tim Noakes or the Baileys receive any funding from Tom Cowan's Weston A. Price Foundation or other such animal ag industry funded front groups. The Bailey's video on bugs that I was initially blocked from was disingenuous and heavily biased in its favour.
I think that the opposite of the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect ('you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story (you know about), and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate') is happening. We read what we agree with, maybe it crystallises what we subconsciously suspected, about 'viruses' and health for example, we research ourselves and everything checks out. We feel part of a wider group. We then turn the page and because we now like, trust and feel allied with the authors we don't do the same critical analysis. Or maybe we do know better but keep quiet, like Dawn L and David P so as not to be dumped out of the group and lose our followers.
There are no long term health studies on low carb, keto nor carnivore diets yet industry funded Weston A Price, Tom Cowan and Tim Noakes get to recommend them to health freedom with impunity. Everything we know about the human body suggest these diets will be very bad for you; yet these dudes get admired and reverenced for promoting them on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/claims-of-weston-a-price-which-are
Seems to me that the unevidenced, no long term data, claims of the low carb, paleo and carnivore diets, can be promoted with impunity by health freedom even though Joe Rogan looks terrible, cholesterol goes through the roof (yes it does, particularly when oxidised in meat and cheese, increase CVD risk-studies only compare very high cholesterol with even higher cholesterol, not someone with actual low cholesterol (sometimes associated with not but causative of ill health with cancer or old age) and of course outcomes aren't improved by statins that block the body's ability to make and balance it while still being exposed to its harms), that people have constipation, brain fog and even strokes, yet still continue with the diets as they're told it's part of the process!
Yet mentioning the microbiome, the beneficial ones only feed on fibre which is only found in plants and which in paleolithic times they probably got about 100 grams of (most Americans don't get even the recommended 25gms) and the benefits of only eating fruit, nuts, legumes and seeds (because the increase in well being means we're more likely to stick with it and never go back) is met with concern about health, mistrust or even insults.
I think it all comes from the zenophoobic propaganda about eating ze bugs.
So totally brilliant, can't wait to get my hands on that book. Mike stone I've READ ALL your latest on covid viruses etc etc followed along meticulously and kept up. A BIG THANK YOU, FOR REALLY OPENING MY EYES and others
Love your work!! Viroliegy.com what a treasure chest. Can anyone help me out? Are ribosomes an actual thing or an artefact of EM?
Love your work!! Viroliegy.com what a treasure chest. Can anyone help me out? Are ribosomes an actual thing or an artefact of EM?
Turfseer’s latest hit song WELCOME TO DISEASE X. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/welcome-to-disease-x. Be afraid. Be VERY afraid.
Restacked with this Note: https://substack.com/@garyslabaugh/note/c-50547247?r=2o118d&utm_medium=ios&utm_source=notes-share-action
Ordered!
Hiya,
So Prof Tim Noakes is a 'renowned (I always mistrust anyone who is given this adjective) nutritionist (he has written books but has no nutrition qualification I can see) and sports scientist' is he?
He reminds me of psychologist Jordan B Peterson. Really slimy. But on a more objective and scientific note; they both moan that they're being censored by the establishment (while both being totally pro-establishment and pro-industry) when they are in fact being censured by their professional bodies, rightly, for professional misconduct. This involves being rude about people with poor mental health in JP’s case and in giving direct internet advice, not allowed for anything let alone unevidenced and potentially harmful neonatal nutrition for which they are not qualified, in TN’s case. They can't do these things under the terms of their registration nor keep their professional status if they do so. No one is trying to censor them.
And I'm still pissed at the Baileys for blocking me for not wanting to discuss the errors in their logic over the farming of animals. Or perhaps they didn’t like me pointing out what they say about evil globalist henchman YNH shows they haven't done their research properly, or at all. Disagreement is helpful and the point of science, and substack.
I'm having a convo with Eric C on this very topic https://planetwavesfm.substack.com/p/in-the-real-world-virus-advocates/comments#comment-50776922
I’ve read several books refuting germ theory and I get what the Baileys are saying. However, I’m not “there” yet. I have long taken personal responsibility for my health and try to avoid the allopathic care system. My perception is that the proponents of terrain theory feel it is sufficient to demonstrate lack of proof of viruses, yet don’t offer alternatives. Like defense attorneys who only need to disprove evidence against their client without having to prove who actually committed the crime.
HUGE THANKS!! GREATLY APPRECIATED!! THIS is another arrow I can use on comments frontline war against those peddling the virus lie. Meryl Nass being a chief culprit. LOL 😄 Had a guy say that the mRNA does what it says on the label and that ribosomes are involved. Do you know anyone who has done a take down of that claim? Your website is AMAZING!! HUGE THANKS!!
Hiya
It would be good journalistic practice to ask whether renowned low carb high fat 'nutritionist' Tim Noakes or the Baileys receive any funding from Tom Cowan's Weston A. Price Foundation or other such animal ag industry funded front groups. The Bailey's video on bugs that I was initially blocked from was disingenuous and heavily biased in its favour.
I think that the opposite of the Murray Gell-Mann Amnesia effect ('you read with exasperation or amusement the multiple errors in a story (you know about), and then turn the page to national or international affairs, and read as if the rest of the newspaper was somehow more accurate') is happening. We read what we agree with, maybe it crystallises what we subconsciously suspected, about 'viruses' and health for example, we research ourselves and everything checks out. We feel part of a wider group. We then turn the page and because we now like, trust and feel allied with the authors we don't do the same critical analysis. Or maybe we do know better but keep quiet, like Dawn L and David P so as not to be dumped out of the group and lose our followers.
There are no long term health studies on low carb, keto nor carnivore diets yet industry funded Weston A Price, Tom Cowan and Tim Noakes get to recommend them to health freedom with impunity. Everything we know about the human body suggest these diets will be very bad for you; yet these dudes get admired and reverenced for promoting them on the basis of no evidence whatsoever. https://jowaller.substack.com/p/claims-of-weston-a-price-which-are
Seems to me that the unevidenced, no long term data, claims of the low carb, paleo and carnivore diets, can be promoted with impunity by health freedom even though Joe Rogan looks terrible, cholesterol goes through the roof (yes it does, particularly when oxidised in meat and cheese, increase CVD risk-studies only compare very high cholesterol with even higher cholesterol, not someone with actual low cholesterol (sometimes associated with not but causative of ill health with cancer or old age) and of course outcomes aren't improved by statins that block the body's ability to make and balance it while still being exposed to its harms), that people have constipation, brain fog and even strokes, yet still continue with the diets as they're told it's part of the process!
Yet mentioning the microbiome, the beneficial ones only feed on fibre which is only found in plants and which in paleolithic times they probably got about 100 grams of (most Americans don't get even the recommended 25gms) and the benefits of only eating fruit, nuts, legumes and seeds (because the increase in well being means we're more likely to stick with it and never go back) is met with concern about health, mistrust or even insults.
I think it all comes from the zenophoobic propaganda about eating ze bugs.