Thanks, Mike. Indeed, Scott Kennedy seems to serving the function of building up the likes of Bigtree and RFK Jr as alleged "leaders" of the resistance, both for those who believe the official narrative as well as people within the "resistance" who are thus encouraged to line up behind the "leaders" so as to defend them against such attacks, reinforcing the false binary which is meant to obscure the fact that neither perspective actually questions the science, which is basically flawed at its foundations.
Agreed Jeffrey! Bigtree and RFK Jr. appear to be the exact opposite of anti-vaccine which makes me rather suspicious as to why they get the label and the "attack" pieces promoting them as such. The fact that they get so much coverage makes me very leary of them. It seems as if they are there to lure in those who are becoming anti-vaccine in order to persuade them to believe that these toxic injections can be made "safer." 🤔
I started seeing these people in a different light.
They tend to believe in official stories of 911 and the pandemic, despite the clear corruption.
They're afraid on some level to see that it's all a big lie.
It's a psychological block.
Even Del Bigtree loves to talk like murica is best nation, lol.
I think he really believes that we have the best systems etc...
On the other hand, Mike Yeadon has been questioning past pandemics and even considering that viruses are a fraud of the Rockefeller system. He's been digging deep!
Sasha Latypova ( https://sashalatypova.substack.com/ ) is also like Yeadon, where she is seeing that gain of function is impossible, even according to their own lore. A deadly disease would not spread much!
They can accept that we've been lied to for decades, unlike Del and RFK Jr, who deny the absolute corruption.
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
Yes, I am very skeptical of those who are unwilling to look at the big picture. Bigtree and Kennedy Jr. are sadly working within the lies rather than trying to dismantle them. It is promising to see Mike Yeadon and others continue to go down the path of awakening. 🙂
Regardless the conflicts of interest or potentials for manipulation, I regard the demand for proof of claim to be more effective than fronting with a counter claim.
The former rests in truth, but the latter can be called to back up and then be given every kind of challenge, questioning or demand for proof of claim by those with endless resources.
Abide with truth rather than fight evil in its own terms.
So to say or assert lack of substance or validity to claims of a pathological gene hacking virus is by revealing - as you do - the lack of science or indeed fraud.
The polarised identity shouting there is no virus becomes the latest variant of flat eart globe-denial by the way it asserts opinions associating with the key communicators - but without an integrated understanding.
People playing out identity conflicts simply want to be right in revealing wrongs to others. The message thus is never really received and accepted as integrative consciousness, but is used as ammo for impact.
That works to subvert communication to an 'identity' that is neutralised.
Communication is NOT impacting or persuading others, but a resonance shared in love of truth - whatever the field of interest and whatever the true qualities embodied by the WAY we share information.
The mind-con trolls have their vibrational signature, and target those of a like mind.
One thing about flat earth that is so telling is when they insist that the powerful invented the lie of the globe earth to make people desperate and helpless by separating them from God and the reality of the world and the universe.
This is totally wrong: those who want power will use anything to drive people crazy, to inactivate them, to destroy all threats to its own existence. They can lie to you saying the earth is flat and you must obey and show your papers or else, and they can lie to you saying the earth is a perfect sphere right in the center of the universe that has all the planets going round it in perfect circles, in constant velocity, forever, and you still have to show your papers.
The truth is irrelevant for power, and merely going against the grain is not a problem for power.
As for people being separate or not from God, that is always between people and God, not between people a bureaucrat and God. God does not have to get a license from any human institution to do anything. If people want to be close to God, they only have to go to God. It's not necessary to debunk all the lies of the world to gain access to the ultimate reality.
Yes the lie and the father of the lie work the means to be-live a separate or conflicted God - and self. As it is its own self reinforcing contradiction it is fatherless (without true foundation), yet that is also a description of a fear of disconnect running as if-actual, mobilising defences that lockdown into structures of mutual reinforcement for exclusion or denial of the feared (mis-taken self). That this runs as survival against terror overwhelm is a basis of apparent intensity of attack that provides a temporary basis for the polarised experience of its predicates, overlaid or interposed as a Separation trauma.
While it is believed we are subject to lies or being lied to, we are masked from our use of these in service of our own participation. So to take your fine example, we don't have to uncover the lies of the world to access truth, but we have tricky minds that can dedicate to such sacrificial struggle AS IF a path to God or source of virtue.
The perspectives uncovered from wholeness extend a recognition of truth to others - whether they are coming from ego-manipulation or not. And create the conditions optimal for freely aligning in life as a more integrally coherent relationship.
But the manipulative mindset is inherent to a sense of incompleteness and lack, that seeks blindly to possess as a means to wholeness - rinse lather & repeat ad - diction!
Thank you, Mike ! This article is helping to inspire me to encourage others to use critical thinking. A documentary such as 'Shot in the Arm' that allegedly defends "the science" can be assessed using Socratic Principles. The two major aspects being ; a) Is there genuine effort to disprove ones assertion (eg, 'vaccines save lives and prevent transmissible disease'), b) non-reliance on appeals to authority or mass acceptance of ones assertion as proof of that assertion (eg, 'trusting "the science" ', as support for the assertion).
Regardless of whether or not viruses exist, we know for certain that vaccines don’t work. Infectious diseases sharply declined due to improved nutrition, sanitation and hygiene. The decline had nothing to do with vaccines and in fact happened in spite of the negative effects (SIDS, autism, asthma and auto-immune disorders) of mass vaccination. Polio and smallpox “declined” after mass-vaccination because these illnesses were simply “redefined”- they never really went away. Vaccines have zero benefit and can only cause harm but they’re promoted anyway because the Powers That Be have used them to stealthily depopulate us for over a century. This depopulation agenda went into overdrive with the COVID hoax.
Here's an interesting article by a former pro-vaxxer who now understand regular vaccines are unsafe and AIDS=HIV was fake. But he still thinks COVID was real:
An excellent, excellent blog. It is the Scott Hamilton Kennedy's in their hubris who have brought so much destruction to the world.
Meanwhile all they do is babble their specious mantra “Trust the Science.” Now “Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have joined forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag
forgive me if you have written about this already, but what do you think about sherry tenpenny and suzanne humphries?
also, i am wondering if you know of any good books and/or other sources about the disgusting state of european (and american) cities up until 19th century public sanitation efforts
this "shot in the arm" documentary reminds me of eula biss's despicable book "on immunity: an innoculation" where she also relies heavily on paul offit and pro vaxx "experts" but she doesn't really bother with the anti-vaxx side, except to mention in a deprecating manner some skeptical mothers whom she met in the process of her own pregnancy.
have never really been inspired by bigtree and kennedy, and have lamented the lack of really good public anti-vaxx people. either it's people who claim there are microchips in vaccines ( which maybe there are, what do i know? ) to people who are fine with vaccines except the covid one scared them a bit because it was rushed and "iT's NoT rEaLlY a VaCcInE"
Yeah. You know, I think most people are going to recommend here, which is that the reason that you had these huge number of deaths in Paris and New York and for example, in northern Italy, which you did not mention in Tuscany, the same time as earlier, actually, than the spikes that I was mentioning.
I'd love to hear your explanation for that. Because that seemed to be I mean, that's where we all got the idea that this virus was galloping through and killing lots and lots of people. And they didn't have remdesivir in Italy at that time, so oh, something was killing people.
And couldn't it be that the virus landed in those places, you know, it lands in big cities, it spreads in big cities much more quickly, because there's denser populations. And of course, there's 35 states that just don't have dense populations where the virus didn't reach or infect large groups of people for a long period of time."
RFK Jr. said this in the interview he hedl w/Denis Rancourt.
This is verbatim- I have the transcript.
How do you think you or I would be received if we proposed such a theory?
There are several other glaring discrepancies in the interview beyond the fsact that Tuscany is not in N Italy. In short RFK does not know what he is talking about on this subject matter yet provides a strong opinion AND in the interivew states it is the opinion others would also lean towards.
RFK Jr. was my first guess but for some reason as I was reading it seemed like it could be Bigtree as well. It is clear that RFK Jr. is only concerned with promoting the mainstream narrative. It is unfortunate that people can not see this.
Well written Mike! Clearly and concisely calls the issue into question without argon attacks and lays it why it matters. I was actually unaware of Scott Kennedy until now! This ties a lot of things together and much of this makes more sense now. Thanks for your work!
Thanks Misha! It is definitely sad and obvious. I was really excited when I first listened to both RFK Jr. and Del Bigtree as I truly thought they were anti-vaccine and on our side. I soon figured out they were not anti-vax and I'm very suspicious of whether they are on our side.
Thanks, Mike. Indeed, Scott Kennedy seems to serving the function of building up the likes of Bigtree and RFK Jr as alleged "leaders" of the resistance, both for those who believe the official narrative as well as people within the "resistance" who are thus encouraged to line up behind the "leaders" so as to defend them against such attacks, reinforcing the false binary which is meant to obscure the fact that neither perspective actually questions the science, which is basically flawed at its foundations.
Agreed Jeffrey! Bigtree and RFK Jr. appear to be the exact opposite of anti-vaccine which makes me rather suspicious as to why they get the label and the "attack" pieces promoting them as such. The fact that they get so much coverage makes me very leary of them. It seems as if they are there to lure in those who are becoming anti-vaccine in order to persuade them to believe that these toxic injections can be made "safer." 🤔
I'm reminded of that old joke that politicians should wear a suit with many patche showing all the brands that finance them, like Formula 1 pilots.
That recommendation can be applied to many other people.
Even then, some people would still believe the lies.
That would definitely make things more interesting. 😉
That's the future world of Idiocracy, where they thought brawndo was the best thing since sliced water 🤑
Hopefully the expert class will keep using the word democracy as though it's not a red flag to the red pilled. Their language gives them away.
I started seeing these people in a different light.
They tend to believe in official stories of 911 and the pandemic, despite the clear corruption.
They're afraid on some level to see that it's all a big lie.
It's a psychological block.
Even Del Bigtree loves to talk like murica is best nation, lol.
I think he really believes that we have the best systems etc...
On the other hand, Mike Yeadon has been questioning past pandemics and even considering that viruses are a fraud of the Rockefeller system. He's been digging deep!
Sasha Latypova ( https://sashalatypova.substack.com/ ) is also like Yeadon, where she is seeing that gain of function is impossible, even according to their own lore. A deadly disease would not spread much!
They can accept that we've been lied to for decades, unlike Del and RFK Jr, who deny the absolute corruption.
(From https://leftlockdownsceptics.com/alleged-cia-involvement-in-jfk-assassination-goes-mainstream-so-now-what/ )
"And then there is the psychological effect of the Big Lie which is axiomatic in gaslighting. The paradox here is that the bigger the lie, the harder it is for the mind to bridge the gulf between perceived reality and the lie that authority figures are painting as truth. I believe that the prospect of being deceived evinces a primitive emotional response on a par with staring death in the face. We are hard-wired to fear deception because we have evolved to interpret it as an existential threat. That’s why deception can elicit the same emotional response as the miscalculation of a serious physical threat. Lies told to us don’t always bear the same cost as a misjudged red light, but the primitive part of the brain can’t make this distinction and we rely on cerebral mediation for a more appropriate but delayed response. And in the long run, the lie is often just as dangerous as the physical threat. Many government whoppers – ‘safe and effective’ – do cost lives.
To avoid the death-like experience of being deceived, a mental defence is erected to deny that the lie is happening."
Yes, I am very skeptical of those who are unwilling to look at the big picture. Bigtree and Kennedy Jr. are sadly working within the lies rather than trying to dismantle them. It is promising to see Mike Yeadon and others continue to go down the path of awakening. 🙂
Regardless the conflicts of interest or potentials for manipulation, I regard the demand for proof of claim to be more effective than fronting with a counter claim.
The former rests in truth, but the latter can be called to back up and then be given every kind of challenge, questioning or demand for proof of claim by those with endless resources.
Abide with truth rather than fight evil in its own terms.
So to say or assert lack of substance or validity to claims of a pathological gene hacking virus is by revealing - as you do - the lack of science or indeed fraud.
The polarised identity shouting there is no virus becomes the latest variant of flat eart globe-denial by the way it asserts opinions associating with the key communicators - but without an integrated understanding.
People playing out identity conflicts simply want to be right in revealing wrongs to others. The message thus is never really received and accepted as integrative consciousness, but is used as ammo for impact.
That works to subvert communication to an 'identity' that is neutralised.
Communication is NOT impacting or persuading others, but a resonance shared in love of truth - whatever the field of interest and whatever the true qualities embodied by the WAY we share information.
The mind-con trolls have their vibrational signature, and target those of a like mind.
Well said Binra! 🙂
One thing about flat earth that is so telling is when they insist that the powerful invented the lie of the globe earth to make people desperate and helpless by separating them from God and the reality of the world and the universe.
This is totally wrong: those who want power will use anything to drive people crazy, to inactivate them, to destroy all threats to its own existence. They can lie to you saying the earth is flat and you must obey and show your papers or else, and they can lie to you saying the earth is a perfect sphere right in the center of the universe that has all the planets going round it in perfect circles, in constant velocity, forever, and you still have to show your papers.
The truth is irrelevant for power, and merely going against the grain is not a problem for power.
As for people being separate or not from God, that is always between people and God, not between people a bureaucrat and God. God does not have to get a license from any human institution to do anything. If people want to be close to God, they only have to go to God. It's not necessary to debunk all the lies of the world to gain access to the ultimate reality.
Yes the lie and the father of the lie work the means to be-live a separate or conflicted God - and self. As it is its own self reinforcing contradiction it is fatherless (without true foundation), yet that is also a description of a fear of disconnect running as if-actual, mobilising defences that lockdown into structures of mutual reinforcement for exclusion or denial of the feared (mis-taken self). That this runs as survival against terror overwhelm is a basis of apparent intensity of attack that provides a temporary basis for the polarised experience of its predicates, overlaid or interposed as a Separation trauma.
While it is believed we are subject to lies or being lied to, we are masked from our use of these in service of our own participation. So to take your fine example, we don't have to uncover the lies of the world to access truth, but we have tricky minds that can dedicate to such sacrificial struggle AS IF a path to God or source of virtue.
The perspectives uncovered from wholeness extend a recognition of truth to others - whether they are coming from ego-manipulation or not. And create the conditions optimal for freely aligning in life as a more integrally coherent relationship.
But the manipulative mindset is inherent to a sense of incompleteness and lack, that seeks blindly to possess as a means to wholeness - rinse lather & repeat ad - diction!
Over and out! or Roger, well met.
Thank you, Mike ! This article is helping to inspire me to encourage others to use critical thinking. A documentary such as 'Shot in the Arm' that allegedly defends "the science" can be assessed using Socratic Principles. The two major aspects being ; a) Is there genuine effort to disprove ones assertion (eg, 'vaccines save lives and prevent transmissible disease'), b) non-reliance on appeals to authority or mass acceptance of ones assertion as proof of that assertion (eg, 'trusting "the science" ', as support for the assertion).
You are very welcome James! 🙂
Regardless of whether or not viruses exist, we know for certain that vaccines don’t work. Infectious diseases sharply declined due to improved nutrition, sanitation and hygiene. The decline had nothing to do with vaccines and in fact happened in spite of the negative effects (SIDS, autism, asthma and auto-immune disorders) of mass vaccination. Polio and smallpox “declined” after mass-vaccination because these illnesses were simply “redefined”- they never really went away. Vaccines have zero benefit and can only cause harm but they’re promoted anyway because the Powers That Be have used them to stealthily depopulate us for over a century. This depopulation agenda went into overdrive with the COVID hoax.
Here's an interesting article by a former pro-vaxxer who now understand regular vaccines are unsafe and AIDS=HIV was fake. But he still thinks COVID was real:
https://www.unz.com/runz/american-pravda-vaccines-and-the-mystery-of-polio/#covid-and-the-rise-of-the-anti-vaxxing-movement
Well said CK! 👏
An excellent, excellent blog. It is the Scott Hamilton Kennedy's in their hubris who have brought so much destruction to the world.
Meanwhile all they do is babble their specious mantra “Trust the Science.” Now “Doctor” Fatty Arbuckle and Buster Keaton have joined forces to remind us “Trust the Science.” Watch TRUST THE SCIENCE RAG here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/trust-the-science-rag
BONUS: Free Download. THE ALTERNATIVE COVID-19 NARRATIVE HANDBOOK. A Collection of useful links. Get it here: https://turfseer.substack.com/p/the-alternative-covid-narrative-handbook
Subscribe to Turfseer's Newsletter. Songs, music videos and much more.
Thank you Turfseer! 🙃
forgive me if you have written about this already, but what do you think about sherry tenpenny and suzanne humphries?
also, i am wondering if you know of any good books and/or other sources about the disgusting state of european (and american) cities up until 19th century public sanitation efforts
this "shot in the arm" documentary reminds me of eula biss's despicable book "on immunity: an innoculation" where she also relies heavily on paul offit and pro vaxx "experts" but she doesn't really bother with the anti-vaxx side, except to mention in a deprecating manner some skeptical mothers whom she met in the process of her own pregnancy.
have never really been inspired by bigtree and kennedy, and have lamented the lack of really good public anti-vaxx people. either it's people who claim there are microchips in vaccines ( which maybe there are, what do i know? ) to people who are fine with vaccines except the covid one scared them a bit because it was rushed and "iT's NoT rEaLlY a VaCcInE"
great article
Hi Brindley,
I'm leary of Tenpenny and I am uncertain about Humphries. It would be nice if Humphries spoke out more as I have not heard much from her as of late.
Quick quiz.
Who said the following?
In what setting and on what date?
Bonus points for providing context.
"Okay, so let me push back on you.
Yeah. You know, I think most people are going to recommend here, which is that the reason that you had these huge number of deaths in Paris and New York and for example, in northern Italy, which you did not mention in Tuscany, the same time as earlier, actually, than the spikes that I was mentioning.
I'd love to hear your explanation for that. Because that seemed to be I mean, that's where we all got the idea that this virus was galloping through and killing lots and lots of people. And they didn't have remdesivir in Italy at that time, so oh, something was killing people.
And couldn't it be that the virus landed in those places, you know, it lands in big cities, it spreads in big cities much more quickly, because there's denser populations. And of course, there's 35 states that just don't have dense populations where the virus didn't reach or infect large groups of people for a long period of time."
I have no clue but I am very curious to find out. 😁
RFK Jr. said this in the interview he hedl w/Denis Rancourt.
This is verbatim- I have the transcript.
How do you think you or I would be received if we proposed such a theory?
There are several other glaring discrepancies in the interview beyond the fsact that Tuscany is not in N Italy. In short RFK does not know what he is talking about on this subject matter yet provides a strong opinion AND in the interivew states it is the opinion others would also lean towards.
RFK Jr. was my first guess but for some reason as I was reading it seemed like it could be Bigtree as well. It is clear that RFK Jr. is only concerned with promoting the mainstream narrative. It is unfortunate that people can not see this.
Well written Mike! Clearly and concisely calls the issue into question without argon attacks and lays it why it matters. I was actually unaware of Scott Kennedy until now! This ties a lot of things together and much of this makes more sense now. Thanks for your work!
Thanks Misha! It is definitely sad and obvious. I was really excited when I first listened to both RFK Jr. and Del Bigtree as I truly thought they were anti-vaccine and on our side. I soon figured out they were not anti-vax and I'm very suspicious of whether they are on our side.