Holy camoly, Mike! What patience you have in assembling all those parts to this post! Must have taken days to assemble...
Hindsight is 20/20, of course, but I would have asked Chris, "Where is the rabid dog that you are daring me to be bitten by?". "When's the last time you met a rabid dog?" "Have you looked at the ingredients for rabies …
Holy camoly, Mike! What patience you have in assembling all those parts to this post! Must have taken days to assemble...
Hindsight is 20/20, of course, but I would have asked Chris, "Where is the rabid dog that you are daring me to be bitten by?". "When's the last time you met a rabid dog?" "Have you looked at the ingredients for rabies vaccines? Do they seem safe for biological/neurological creatures?"
Kudos for trying to enlighten him.
I'd love nothing more than to convince Debunk Dave and Professor Dave Farina that the Germ Theory is a fraud, but those guys are intransigently attached to their appeals to authority & consensus. They truly think they are virtuous for memorizing a narrative put forth by an Authority and regurgitating it verbatim. They don't seem able to conceive of being lied to by an Authority. THAT'S THE BIGGEST ISSUE >> They can't get beyond their incredulousness about an Authority or Government lying to them. If they could get beyond it, then they'd be able to suspend their disbelief and entertain our arguments and see for themselves how viruses have never been proven to exist, and why it's absolutely insane to give biological bodies synthetic chemicals in an attempt to help them recover from or prevent an illness.
Debunk Dave & Professor Dave possess the mental faculties needed to understand why the Germ Theory is a fraud; Chris Sky does not. He's clever enough to use an AI Chatbot, but not clever enough to comprehend a Gold Standard related to methodologies used to acquire data.
I've thought about challenging both of them to a debate, but I can see it would be futile because of their intransigent appeals to authority & consensus. In fact, that would have to be debated in the first instance >> the foolishness & naivete associated with appeals to authority & consensus versus appeals to logic & reason.
Holy camoly, Mike! What patience you have in assembling all those parts to this post! Must have taken days to assemble...
Hindsight is 20/20, of course, but I would have asked Chris, "Where is the rabid dog that you are daring me to be bitten by?". "When's the last time you met a rabid dog?" "Have you looked at the ingredients for rabies vaccines? Do they seem safe for biological/neurological creatures?"
Kudos for trying to enlighten him.
I'd love nothing more than to convince Debunk Dave and Professor Dave Farina that the Germ Theory is a fraud, but those guys are intransigently attached to their appeals to authority & consensus. They truly think they are virtuous for memorizing a narrative put forth by an Authority and regurgitating it verbatim. They don't seem able to conceive of being lied to by an Authority. THAT'S THE BIGGEST ISSUE >> They can't get beyond their incredulousness about an Authority or Government lying to them. If they could get beyond it, then they'd be able to suspend their disbelief and entertain our arguments and see for themselves how viruses have never been proven to exist, and why it's absolutely insane to give biological bodies synthetic chemicals in an attempt to help them recover from or prevent an illness.
Debunk Dave & Professor Dave possess the mental faculties needed to understand why the Germ Theory is a fraud; Chris Sky does not. He's clever enough to use an AI Chatbot, but not clever enough to comprehend a Gold Standard related to methodologies used to acquire data.
I've thought about challenging both of them to a debate, but I can see it would be futile because of their intransigent appeals to authority & consensus. In fact, that would have to be debated in the first instance >> the foolishness & naivete associated with appeals to authority & consensus versus appeals to logic & reason.