I read some of this stuff on SubStack the other day. It's disturbing, but I've been witnessing his and some of his cohorts' truly abusive behavior on X. His claims about you and the "no-virus crowd" have run counter to what I've observed these past four or five years about Doctors Cowan, Kaufman, and the Baileys and others in this movement for truth--not just about viruses and other so-called pathogens, but about reality in general. The articles I read threw "flat earthers" and "urine drinkers" around as evidence that you were controlled opposition trying to discredit the no-virus position, but damn, I've been following all these different threads, and what I see is the willingness to look at EVERYTHING we've been told is true. And what's wrong with that? I haven't heard claims that these ideas are true, only that it's important to look at what we've been told is true and really examine it.
If anything, I think Jamie is mentally ill, possibly with what the psych community terms Cluster B; he's definitely disordered, scarily so. He doesn't refute anything; he spews vitriol and abuse and is projecting his own intentions onto you. I stopped paying attention to anything he says because so much of what he says is patently untrue.
Thanks for countering his insane, disturbing claims. I think it needed to be said.
Virus just means poison or venom in the original Latin, and using the term for social events, movements, etc. is metaphorical. I don’t think that the literal existence of virus as pathogen is necessary. Videos DO go viral in the contemporary sense.
As for those folks in the “no virus camp,” the message I get over and over from that group is here are the studies; this is what they’re saying or not saying; think about it; draw your own conclusions; KEEP thinking about things. Alec Zeck, the Terrain Theory podcast, and others exploring new ways to look at the world—including Mike Stones’ Viroliegy—keep presenting new ideas by forward-thinking people that ask more and more questions. The message, as I’m receiving it, is to stay curious and open. IMHO, that ain’t controlled opposition. In fact, it’s anything but.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
I politely suggest YOU catch up & read this (link below)-
if you are as smart as it seems you wish to appear, then you should learn much of great importance, At the moment it seems to involve a bit too much posing & a conceited nature too familiar with ALL 'no-virus soapboxers. Your lack of ability to really address content is one problem that mires you, as is a complete lack of gratitude for interacting constructively. How high do you imagine your horse is?
Possibly ALL of them are playing perception manipulation games,
its a syntax & semiotic assault from BOTH sides.
The controlled ops are such a massive industry now that they have become arrogant & crass.
Jamie is probably at least 99% controlled ops, or IN EFFECT HE IS, as his actions & alliances prove he does not care about HUMAN BEINGS , he cares about being KNOWN, even if that involves hatred.The fact he encourages that hatred is a standard advertising twist.
The publicity is paramount.
This arrogance does not always imply consolidation, as 'real' people can be stubborn & pedantic in similar ways- not caring how others perceive them- YET in this instance it is suicidal tactics for such a publicly sensitive, important topic & massive influence on our well being, never mind the economic factors involved!
He may be genuinely mentally ill (I think this is so) or playing a ROLE, I think it may well be both- he was chosen for this vocation because of such factors.
The horror of this is that he may be telling A LOT OF TRUTH, & also the BAILEYS etc may well be just another tentacle of the same wriggling creature. In effect the game is to cast doubt & diminish whatever truths & genuine personalities are involved & to do it in such a way that those being informed are also in some ways being made to appear stupider-
So what is the big stupidity of the no-virus gameplay?
Friends & myself have come to the conclusion from much interaction here that the BIG CON is the idea & promotion that ‘no virus’ behavior exists OUTSIDE of biological systems.
I concur that ‘no-virus’ activity appears to usually occur in human bodies as ‘disease’, yet what the pundits promoting this idea CAN NEVER ADMIT is that virus behavior CERTAINLY does exist psychologically, socially, imaginatively & in the media.
This FACT was well known long before even computer virus’ were conceived. Propaganda, Adverting & social intercourse is moderated & manipulated by such VIRAL behavior, so to ignore that or deny it is actually just a damaging & dangerous as the medicinal con being derailed over biological systems & their workings.
VIRUSES ALWAYS EXISTED AS ARTIFICIAL VERSION CONTAGIOUS CONCOCTION TO SELL VACCINES SINCE 1800s! NATURAL VIRUS NOT NEEDED TO SCAM YOU
Theres no stronger position in truther movement then No Viruses Exist and only a handful are resisting it I being one and noticed when I posit my arguments they have zero interest in exploring their merit even to smallest degree ie their leaders fight it from a non search for truth vantage rigged from start as you pointed out for some reason..
Few possible motivations but none larger then reducing attentions to biolabs over the top risky or actually destructive war games on populace.
See they also crazily target synthetic lab concoctions every batch as somehow guaranteed to never muster natural virus level or percentage contagion or transferability at basically psychic apparently level as hundreds of labs try for decades to include high contagion in their menu of brews to dust us with it inject,etc…this happening when right in our face many toxins individual or combined are given strict ratings as to how many particles are required to penetrate the skin or nasal etc before fatal particle critical mass is reached.Operation seaspray SF verified each resident received 60,000 particles or so needed for fatality if they adjusted seratta mas. bacteria formula bit from non fatal to fatal (1.1 million dead in 24-48 hours official report stat!)but handful died anyway as serrata m.causes nearby fungals to grow at like 3000 times normal rate for a day before dying why chem fog filled with serrata m.s purple Haze just visible caused one of worst flu like seasons November:2024 to Feb. 2025 that occurred with weird drones, UFOs waves first By,then hundred or so world cities..many sickened,killed that no virus crowd mum about despite flu stats at or near record (wasn't flu..and strange mind wave push to ignore all that).Many homes and cars ruined by growths including mine and gardens with purple hairs to 3” in one day , hello!
I digress ,point is biolab agendas tied close to big pharma,tied to military tied to largest moneyflows from bankers known..do you really feel that those guys can't afford to invest in a serious contingent of shills that look like classic organic hippies or like pushing every natural button yet lying about biolabs ability to create to a T a synthetic concoction that would match most criteria of a natural virus if not all; even if on lower end of contagion requirements set in 1800s?!,it works with adequate distribution particle wise see?
However I think transmission,contagion test, experiments were a sham as well , first only a handful of them and all low number participants so easy to rig.. I experienced several waves of illness in 70s,80s more common then ie experimenting they were((just a bad flu dear.).
Virus term originated largely when synthetic lab concoctiond began early 1800s,some day prior so if no natural viruses exist and it was always a game of mixing bacteria, fungus,toxins,venoms,puss from animals etc and exposing public and then saying vaccines are the solution,then for all honest purposes viruses do exist as lab bio war concoctions!
When pushed most of these shills will reveal themselves by pushing back on bio labs obvious threats.. funny they'll usually realize they've been entrapped and stop defense of oh so safe biolabs that really somehow don't exist ever in any meaningful way lala land try..so pathetic! Strategy is to say no virus, extend by implication to no artificial virus without voicing it ie subconscious ploy largely(or weirdly pushing it even to no lab toxin concoctions at all,just like nukes,don't exist..what!! ..that point people see them as shill so rare they'll bring up subject or not retreat bit of does).
Other aspect is they don't want people focusing on create problem needing solution that was always vaccines way ie they spread horse puss,get people sick 1800s then give vaccine w same puss or saline solution depending on how they like you or don't…
Same today ,95 percent of covid vaxx caused by 4 percent of vaccine batch lots averaging 150,000,82 percent of side effects, deaths tied to republican,christian counties USA..
'most of these shills will reveal themselves by pushing back on bio labs obvious threats'' exactly. The excuse being -there is no threat- if the sermon is taken to heart.
But as mentioned also- they can't admit psychic viral attributes, or when pushed just dismiss them as 'yeah we know already' with no depth of what forces they are & the complexities (science of it ) involved- it is THE SPECTACLE & they never address that factor like informed adults either.
The CRUX (I think, but love different views ) is SYMPATHETIC RESONANCE . What we envision as 'tiny life forms & fungus etc' are the visual component of complex, correspondent resonant fields. These are degenerative when in disharmony or of a certain type, & benign when in synergy AND of a certain type- & the opposite is also true, it depends on the individual, environment & state of being they are in.
So while there is no Covid 'bacteria' necessarily, there was an massive influx of RF field interactions & saturation & that is what the 'dis-ease' was.
The same is true of biolabs - much is fear tactics, grant scavenging & bogeybugs, much is RESONANCE research & that may include fungi & cell cultivation. The chemical reactions divisions are akin, but slightly different as Im sure you know, as you've mentioned them with validity.
In effect many biological manipulations are dependent (& even disguised versions of ) resonance manipulations of sympathetic fields, more than simply vector activation (line of sight etc) or a toxic 'particle/substance' - the later are typically mediums considered the catalysts.
Very clear and thorough, thank you for taking the time to document this Mike. It must have taken many hours.
Dealing with this constant nonsense is so draining, and it's almost as if some people want to distract you from your normal work of exposing 'germ' scams.
The quality, restraint and tenor of your language, Mike, stands in stark contrast to the torrent of linguistic flotsam floating in from your detractors. The calibre of your work and that of the Baileys, Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman becomes ever more apparent the more frothy the assertions coming in. Thank you for calm and considered interactions.
I hoped the information came through clearly. While I’d prefer not to have to respond to Jamie’s libelous claims, I think it’s now evident that his pattern is to disregard the facts and fabricate stories to fit his narrative. My hope is that people now see that any accusations from him should be viewed with considerable skepticism, as Jamie has repeatedly shown a disregard for the truth.
I wouldn’t be publicly levelling false and libelous accusations at the very man who has forensically dismantled the fraud of germ theory—piece by piece, lie by lie. Mike Stone’s work stands as a towering rebuke to virology’s baseless dogmas, and the banner of his brilliant website, viroliegy.com, makes no bones about it:
"Exposing the lies of Germ Theory and virology using their own sources."
That same sharp precision and integrity which shaped his mission statement has now been meticulously refocused on dissecting Andrews’ own claims—using his sources, his words, and his contradictions. If there’s any grift here, it’s not coming from Mike’s end.
To persist down this morally bankrupt path is not just reputational self-harm—it’s an open invitation to public ridicule and legal scrutiny. One can only wonder why Andrews insists on firing live rounds into his own foot while digging an ever-deepening hole, ethically, legally, and intellectually.
This sort of conduct doesn’t reflect the spirit of the No Virus Community—a movement grounded in evidence, transparency, and principle. Instead, it mirrors the very tactics we've come to expect from the sociopathic boardrooms of Big Harma, where truth is expendable, and deception is policy.
Absolute pleasure, guv! It’s the least I can do after being a massive beneficiary of the magnum opus that is viroliegy.com.
I’m truly sorry you’re having to deal with this nonsense. It’s as frustrating as it is undeserved.
I think we can all agree that your prodigious talents are far better spent continuing to dismantle the germ theory hoax—rather than being forced to wade through these intolerable and utterly baseless slanders.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
Mike, Andrews comes across here not just as disturbed, but downright jealous—of your credibility, alliances, and the trust you’ve earned. His shifting narratives, wild accusations, and theatrical victimhood read less like truth-telling and more like resentment that you’ve surpassed him. Your response dismantles his claims point by point, leaving little doubt about who’s really “out of control.”
I pray that you give up your obsession with this dumb son of a bitch, Jamie. You're too important to waste your good years agreeing to spar with some cretin who obviously enjoys the process, while you resort to logic to bring him to heel. LOGIC WON'T WORK, BROTHER. Not here.
I’m so sorry, Mike. I honestly haven’t read it. I wish you didn’t feel you had to PAY ATTENTION to his nonsense, validating in the process of doing so. Sometimes silence is louder than words.
I did consider not responding to Jamie's article. However, I believe it's important not to let false and libelous claims go unchallenged—especially when they’re so easily refuted with evidence. Hopefully, this puts the matter to rest. I don’t respond to seek attention or validation, only to uphold the truth and protect my name. Thanks for the feedback. 🙂
Thanks for supplying these details, Mike, it further cements the conclusions i have already reached.
Jamie Andrews is a pathological liar. I'm glad to say that i started suspecting him as soon as i saw his first public interview, when he claimed all sorts of amazing results via alleged lab tests allegedly "proving viruses don't exist," an hypothesis which is impossible to prove in a manner which satisfies the Scientific Method. And these were tests allegedly done by labs whose identity he withheld. Matters regarding him have gone downhill since. I recently noticed he had started "following" my Substack, and moved to block him.
My husband and I had a similar situation many years ago where we turned the other cheek, as we believed we were supposed to do. We thought that people who knew us would not believe the lies, and others would ask US if they weren’t sure what to think. We found out that people will believe anything you don’t contest.
I hate that you’re having to wade into the filth, but maybe it’s necessary. Who knows
TLDR..... Well, ok, I skimmed enough to see what's going on.... For him/them, Cognitive Dissonance & Confirmation Bias combine to create a false reality....and in that "reality", lies are truth, and truth are lies....
Sorry for you, Mike, BUT, your efforts ARE valuable, and do represent positive forward progress....
Having been on the inside of this unfortunate storm for a good while now, are you able to make any definitive statements on the scientific "validity" of Jamie's so-called Control Studies Project?
I need to know whether I must remove the content from my "Virology's Fatal Flaw" essay.
After all, just because Jamie is a compulsive and abusive liar, it does not invalidate scientific experiments done by others in another lab that happened to have had the misfortune of being published by him.
While Jamie Andrews’ Virology Control Project is valuable in highlighting the flaws in traditional virology and exposing the pseudoscientific nature of cell culture methods, it does not make Jamie’s work scientific because it still uses the same flawed approach that virologists rely on, failing to adhere to the basic principles of science.
Science is fundamentally about observing natural phenomena—events or processes that occur in the real world—and testing hypotheses to explain them through cause-and-effect relationships. A valid scientific hypothesis must be based on such observed phenomena and be testable in ways that reflect natural conditions.
Jamie’s project does not start from any naturally occurring disease process. Instead, it relies on cytopathogenic effects (CPE)—an artificial laboratory-created phenomenon that arises from manipulating cell cultures under unnatural conditions (such as serum starvation, antibiotics, or other chemical exposures). This effect does not occur in nature and has no direct counterpart in living organisms.
Because the dependent variable in these experiments is an artifact of the lab setup rather than a genuine natural effect, the results do not provide evidence relevant to real-world disease processes. In that sense, Jamie’s work simply reproduces the same pseudoscientific methods used by virologists, showing that CPE can be caused by other factors—but still failing to demonstrate anything about how disease occurs in nature.
Therefore, while the project is helpful for exposing the methodological problems in virology, it does not itself meet the standards of scientific inquiry and would not be considered scientific.
I think there's a movement to destroy scientific method afoot, with JA an atavar. This lines up with general discard of anything that makes life better for flesh and blood people, in favor of computer takeover, now normalized.
Quick question: Stefan Lanka did a similar experiment a while back - I saw it presented on Katie Sugak’s channel in 2021 or 2022 I think. It seemed to be all about CPE and how it could be induced anyway by the process itself. Would you say that’s not scientific either? I thought it was a good way to show the methodology isn’t sound - testing the method rather than testing a scientific hypothesis if you like
Good question. Lanka’s experiment wasn’t testing a “virus” hypothesis—it was a methodological critique. He showed CPE can occur without a “virus,” exposing that the method itself produces the effect. It’s not a full scientific experiment, but it is a valid falsification of the method virologists rely on.
I was criticized quite a bit for grammatical and spelling errors in the past, so AI became a very convenient way to ensure these were corrected in my articles. I guess it became a bit of a bad habit to use it to correct them in the comments as well. 😉
AH, but this is the crux of the times-''Science is fundamentally about observing natural phenomena''
Well, now it isnt is it, & hasn't been since the INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION , where it became a form of industry & abuse of nature.
It is now almost entirely concerned with SYNTHETIC phenomena, artificial environments & virtual data interaction for social control /exploitation strategies.
''just because Jamie is a compulsive and abusive liar, it does not invalidate scientific experiments done by others in another lab that happened to have had the misfortune of being published by him.'''
And that is precisely why he is doing what he is doing in the way he is.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
I think most folk here know that ConVD 19 is a phantom menace,
that the pharmaceutical combine is a death dealing industry akin to a cult for 'rationalization' fanatics propelled by conceit & greed;
& that the pulverized mess of samples they find their messiahs within are akin to rosharch test blotting paper, dancing into whatever visage the 'ScienTits' wish.
The evasion of AETHERIC influences & reactions is what far too many smug-bugs are missing. 5G tec IS THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM, that all these squabbles are desperate to evade because you LIVE IN A AETHERIC ARENA - yet I bet have almost no clue what the AETHER really is or how it manifests & interacts- both externally & internally.
PLASMA is the primary manifestation of AETHER, via the four main formative Ethers & this also will help explain what THE CELL actually is & how its 'membrane/shell/wall' is actually a resonant artifact.
Of course valid but novel ideas attract abuse or intellectual evasion, this is a historical fact- so briefly I will prove my point & anyone here can try & disprove it because this taps into a biofield-centric and energetic systems view of life:
Plasma, as a fourth state of matter, is highly conductive and responsive to electromagnetic fields. It’s used metaphorically (and sometimes literally) in theories of subtle energy and bioelectromagnetics.
The biofield hypothesis suggests that cells are embedded in and shaped by standing wave patterns, not just chemical gradients.
In this view, the “membrane” isn’t a wall — it’s a node of coherence, a resonant interface between scalar fields and biological form.
This aligns with ideas from electrodynamic life theory, where the field both determines and is determined by the particle. The membrane becomes a threshold, not a barrier — a place where form emerges from frequency.
This is a valid re-imagining of phenomenology & cosmology I have been shaping with close friends - here (link ) is a great overview of what we've been devising-https://substack.com/home/post/p-168701689
Speculations about our reality are ok as long as they are presented as such. And it is better not pretend to know what is and what occurs on not perceivable levels of our reality.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
Discern where to give your energy, attention and value. That is your freedom.
If you contract into such a 'engagement' that has no intent to communicate or extend relational honour or honesty - you may lose your focus - and that is exactly what the stakeholders in weaponised lies intend.
Let your work be your witness.
Use the pressure of such a 'trap' to provide the momentum to release your 'trigger points'.
How are we 'infected' by hacking or hijacking bait& provocation but via 'back doors' we otherwise didn't fully recognise as a liability.
If people are not honest - disengage.
Of course the stakeholders include anyone who gets a boost of 'meaning' to their life from engaging in the narratives for such purpose. They don't have to be controlled op to be part of the fog.
You think rationally demonstrable evidences are enough to change the mind of others, but while there is merit in revealing fraudulent, specious or fallacious claims relevant to destructive control agenda, you might realise that desire for truth is rare in a world of lies - or to put it another way - of vested and defended self illusion.
Let the dead bury the dead - attend the Living.
If something is serious, consider litigation, but not as personal vengeance or you'd be better off releasing everything to live a whole life - anyway - and any way.
I read some of this stuff on SubStack the other day. It's disturbing, but I've been witnessing his and some of his cohorts' truly abusive behavior on X. His claims about you and the "no-virus crowd" have run counter to what I've observed these past four or five years about Doctors Cowan, Kaufman, and the Baileys and others in this movement for truth--not just about viruses and other so-called pathogens, but about reality in general. The articles I read threw "flat earthers" and "urine drinkers" around as evidence that you were controlled opposition trying to discredit the no-virus position, but damn, I've been following all these different threads, and what I see is the willingness to look at EVERYTHING we've been told is true. And what's wrong with that? I haven't heard claims that these ideas are true, only that it's important to look at what we've been told is true and really examine it.
If anything, I think Jamie is mentally ill, possibly with what the psych community terms Cluster B; he's definitely disordered, scarily so. He doesn't refute anything; he spews vitriol and abuse and is projecting his own intentions onto you. I stopped paying attention to anything he says because so much of what he says is patently untrue.
Thanks for countering his insane, disturbing claims. I think it needed to be said.
Virus just means poison or venom in the original Latin, and using the term for social events, movements, etc. is metaphorical. I don’t think that the literal existence of virus as pathogen is necessary. Videos DO go viral in the contemporary sense.
As for those folks in the “no virus camp,” the message I get over and over from that group is here are the studies; this is what they’re saying or not saying; think about it; draw your own conclusions; KEEP thinking about things. Alec Zeck, the Terrain Theory podcast, and others exploring new ways to look at the world—including Mike Stones’ Viroliegy—keep presenting new ideas by forward-thinking people that ask more and more questions. The message, as I’m receiving it, is to stay curious and open. IMHO, that ain’t controlled opposition. In fact, it’s anything but.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
May 16th 2021 "Not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID," she said. "They may have had mild disease but died, for example, of a heart attack." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-walensky-criticism-updated-guidance-coronavirus-deaths
January 21st 2022 a noble Nobel PCR Inventor, Kary Mullis. https://banned.video/watch?id=61eb268a060c640ca547677c -- Originally published this 10/15/2020 and I've since made an even better video about him HERE https://futurenews.news/watch?id=61ab744efe336b045dbcf549 but I thought this was worth uploading here also. sources Crimes Against Humanity https://www.bitchute.com/video/wNuz54BqUgc/ PCR https://youtu.be/QhyaFStJEvU Kary Mullis https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI https://youtu.be/dL3cAS3YUKM https://youtu.be/3OrdJhueROo https://youtu.be/iWOJKuSKw5c https://youtu.be/4VUswvCLMII SPIN.‘SINS OF OMISSION’ https://archive.vn/SN1ne Interview with Kary Mullis https://archive.vn/2AY62 Fauci’s First Fraud https://www.bitchute.com/video/t7nJJiOidzQH/
January 19th 2022 VIRUS-ISOLATION IS IT REAL? ANDREW KAUFMAN MD RESPONDS TO JEREMY HAMMOND https://www.bitchute.com/video/UnpfmjmXNH0O/
January 15th 2022 Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/fauci-admits-pcr-test-cannot-detect-infection/
January 10th 2022 Fake Science, Invalid Data: There is No Such Thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. There is No Pandemic https://www.globalresearch.ca/fake-science-invalid-data-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-confirmed-covid-19-case-there-is-no-pandemic/5761960
January 8th 2021 The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-rt-pcr-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-using-a-test-to-lock-down-society/5728483
January 6th 2022 The Identity of the Virus: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification". Freedom of Information Requests. The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”? https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
January 2nd 2022 Harm, a Powerful Banned Documentary on Fraudulent PCR Tests Instantly Went Viral Before Being Deleted https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2022/01/harm-a-powerful-banned-documentary-on-fraudulent-pcr-tests-instantly-went-viral-before-being-deleted-3764636.html
I politely suggest YOU catch up & read this (link below)-
if you are as smart as it seems you wish to appear, then you should learn much of great importance, At the moment it seems to involve a bit too much posing & a conceited nature too familiar with ALL 'no-virus soapboxers. Your lack of ability to really address content is one problem that mires you, as is a complete lack of gratitude for interacting constructively. How high do you imagine your horse is?
https://substack.com/@theblueskymaiden1/p-168701689
Possibly ALL of them are playing perception manipulation games,
its a syntax & semiotic assault from BOTH sides.
The controlled ops are such a massive industry now that they have become arrogant & crass.
Jamie is probably at least 99% controlled ops, or IN EFFECT HE IS, as his actions & alliances prove he does not care about HUMAN BEINGS , he cares about being KNOWN, even if that involves hatred.The fact he encourages that hatred is a standard advertising twist.
The publicity is paramount.
This arrogance does not always imply consolidation, as 'real' people can be stubborn & pedantic in similar ways- not caring how others perceive them- YET in this instance it is suicidal tactics for such a publicly sensitive, important topic & massive influence on our well being, never mind the economic factors involved!
He may be genuinely mentally ill (I think this is so) or playing a ROLE, I think it may well be both- he was chosen for this vocation because of such factors.
The horror of this is that he may be telling A LOT OF TRUTH, & also the BAILEYS etc may well be just another tentacle of the same wriggling creature. In effect the game is to cast doubt & diminish whatever truths & genuine personalities are involved & to do it in such a way that those being informed are also in some ways being made to appear stupider-
So what is the big stupidity of the no-virus gameplay?
Friends & myself have come to the conclusion from much interaction here that the BIG CON is the idea & promotion that ‘no virus’ behavior exists OUTSIDE of biological systems.
I concur that ‘no-virus’ activity appears to usually occur in human bodies as ‘disease’, yet what the pundits promoting this idea CAN NEVER ADMIT is that virus behavior CERTAINLY does exist psychologically, socially, imaginatively & in the media.
This FACT was well known long before even computer virus’ were conceived. Propaganda, Adverting & social intercourse is moderated & manipulated by such VIRAL behavior, so to ignore that or deny it is actually just a damaging & dangerous as the medicinal con being derailed over biological systems & their workings.
close with Seamoan-
its actually
Richard Seager
@plebeianresistance
VIRUSES ALWAYS EXISTED AS ARTIFICIAL VERSION CONTAGIOUS CONCOCTION TO SELL VACCINES SINCE 1800s! NATURAL VIRUS NOT NEEDED TO SCAM YOU
Theres no stronger position in truther movement then No Viruses Exist and only a handful are resisting it I being one and noticed when I posit my arguments they have zero interest in exploring their merit even to smallest degree ie their leaders fight it from a non search for truth vantage rigged from start as you pointed out for some reason..
Few possible motivations but none larger then reducing attentions to biolabs over the top risky or actually destructive war games on populace.
See they also crazily target synthetic lab concoctions every batch as somehow guaranteed to never muster natural virus level or percentage contagion or transferability at basically psychic apparently level as hundreds of labs try for decades to include high contagion in their menu of brews to dust us with it inject,etc…this happening when right in our face many toxins individual or combined are given strict ratings as to how many particles are required to penetrate the skin or nasal etc before fatal particle critical mass is reached.Operation seaspray SF verified each resident received 60,000 particles or so needed for fatality if they adjusted seratta mas. bacteria formula bit from non fatal to fatal (1.1 million dead in 24-48 hours official report stat!)but handful died anyway as serrata m.causes nearby fungals to grow at like 3000 times normal rate for a day before dying why chem fog filled with serrata m.s purple Haze just visible caused one of worst flu like seasons November:2024 to Feb. 2025 that occurred with weird drones, UFOs waves first By,then hundred or so world cities..many sickened,killed that no virus crowd mum about despite flu stats at or near record (wasn't flu..and strange mind wave push to ignore all that).Many homes and cars ruined by growths including mine and gardens with purple hairs to 3” in one day , hello!
I digress ,point is biolab agendas tied close to big pharma,tied to military tied to largest moneyflows from bankers known..do you really feel that those guys can't afford to invest in a serious contingent of shills that look like classic organic hippies or like pushing every natural button yet lying about biolabs ability to create to a T a synthetic concoction that would match most criteria of a natural virus if not all; even if on lower end of contagion requirements set in 1800s?!,it works with adequate distribution particle wise see?
However I think transmission,contagion test, experiments were a sham as well , first only a handful of them and all low number participants so easy to rig.. I experienced several waves of illness in 70s,80s more common then ie experimenting they were((just a bad flu dear.).
Virus term originated largely when synthetic lab concoctiond began early 1800s,some day prior so if no natural viruses exist and it was always a game of mixing bacteria, fungus,toxins,venoms,puss from animals etc and exposing public and then saying vaccines are the solution,then for all honest purposes viruses do exist as lab bio war concoctions!
When pushed most of these shills will reveal themselves by pushing back on bio labs obvious threats.. funny they'll usually realize they've been entrapped and stop defense of oh so safe biolabs that really somehow don't exist ever in any meaningful way lala land try..so pathetic! Strategy is to say no virus, extend by implication to no artificial virus without voicing it ie subconscious ploy largely(or weirdly pushing it even to no lab toxin concoctions at all,just like nukes,don't exist..what!! ..that point people see them as shill so rare they'll bring up subject or not retreat bit of does).
Other aspect is they don't want people focusing on create problem needing solution that was always vaccines way ie they spread horse puss,get people sick 1800s then give vaccine w same puss or saline solution depending on how they like you or don't…
Same today ,95 percent of covid vaxx caused by 4 percent of vaccine batch lots averaging 150,000,82 percent of side effects, deaths tied to republican,christian counties USA..
See howbadismybatch.com
'most of these shills will reveal themselves by pushing back on bio labs obvious threats'' exactly. The excuse being -there is no threat- if the sermon is taken to heart.
But as mentioned also- they can't admit psychic viral attributes, or when pushed just dismiss them as 'yeah we know already' with no depth of what forces they are & the complexities (science of it ) involved- it is THE SPECTACLE & they never address that factor like informed adults either.
The CRUX (I think, but love different views ) is SYMPATHETIC RESONANCE . What we envision as 'tiny life forms & fungus etc' are the visual component of complex, correspondent resonant fields. These are degenerative when in disharmony or of a certain type, & benign when in synergy AND of a certain type- & the opposite is also true, it depends on the individual, environment & state of being they are in.
So while there is no Covid 'bacteria' necessarily, there was an massive influx of RF field interactions & saturation & that is what the 'dis-ease' was.
The same is true of biolabs - much is fear tactics, grant scavenging & bogeybugs, much is RESONANCE research & that may include fungi & cell cultivation. The chemical reactions divisions are akin, but slightly different as Im sure you know, as you've mentioned them with validity.
In effect many biological manipulations are dependent (& even disguised versions of ) resonance manipulations of sympathetic fields, more than simply vector activation (line of sight etc) or a toxic 'particle/substance' - the later are typically mediums considered the catalysts.
Very clear and thorough, thank you for taking the time to document this Mike. It must have taken many hours.
Dealing with this constant nonsense is so draining, and it's almost as if some people want to distract you from your normal work of exposing 'germ' scams.
The quality, restraint and tenor of your language, Mike, stands in stark contrast to the torrent of linguistic flotsam floating in from your detractors. The calibre of your work and that of the Baileys, Tom Cowan and Andy Kaufman becomes ever more apparent the more frothy the assertions coming in. Thank you for calm and considered interactions.
Thank you for the kind words, Yvette. I really appreciate it. 🙂
You are awesome Mike.
Thank you for posting your rebuttal. Perfectly done brother
Thank you, Bill. I really appreciate it. 🙂
I hoped the information came through clearly. While I’d prefer not to have to respond to Jamie’s libelous claims, I think it’s now evident that his pattern is to disregard the facts and fabricate stories to fit his narrative. My hope is that people now see that any accusations from him should be viewed with considerable skepticism, as Jamie has repeatedly shown a disregard for the truth.
I wouldn’t be publicly levelling false and libelous accusations at the very man who has forensically dismantled the fraud of germ theory—piece by piece, lie by lie. Mike Stone’s work stands as a towering rebuke to virology’s baseless dogmas, and the banner of his brilliant website, viroliegy.com, makes no bones about it:
"Exposing the lies of Germ Theory and virology using their own sources."
That same sharp precision and integrity which shaped his mission statement has now been meticulously refocused on dissecting Andrews’ own claims—using his sources, his words, and his contradictions. If there’s any grift here, it’s not coming from Mike’s end.
To persist down this morally bankrupt path is not just reputational self-harm—it’s an open invitation to public ridicule and legal scrutiny. One can only wonder why Andrews insists on firing live rounds into his own foot while digging an ever-deepening hole, ethically, legally, and intellectually.
This sort of conduct doesn’t reflect the spirit of the No Virus Community—a movement grounded in evidence, transparency, and principle. Instead, it mirrors the very tactics we've come to expect from the sociopathic boardrooms of Big Harma, where truth is expendable, and deception is policy.
Thank you, Factscinator. I greatly appreciate the kind words. 🙂
Absolute pleasure, guv! It’s the least I can do after being a massive beneficiary of the magnum opus that is viroliegy.com.
I’m truly sorry you’re having to deal with this nonsense. It’s as frustrating as it is undeserved.
I think we can all agree that your prodigious talents are far better spent continuing to dismantle the germ theory hoax—rather than being forced to wade through these intolerable and utterly baseless slanders.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
May 16th 2021 "Not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID," she said. "They may have had mild disease but died, for example, of a heart attack." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-walensky-criticism-updated-guidance-coronavirus-deaths
January 21st 2022 a noble Nobel PCR Inventor, Kary Mullis. https://banned.video/watch?id=61eb268a060c640ca547677c -- Originally published this 10/15/2020 and I've since made an even better video about him HERE https://futurenews.news/watch?id=61ab744efe336b045dbcf549 but I thought this was worth uploading here also. sources Crimes Against Humanity https://www.bitchute.com/video/wNuz54BqUgc/ PCR https://youtu.be/QhyaFStJEvU Kary Mullis https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI https://youtu.be/dL3cAS3YUKM https://youtu.be/3OrdJhueROo https://youtu.be/iWOJKuSKw5c https://youtu.be/4VUswvCLMII SPIN.‘SINS OF OMISSION’ https://archive.vn/SN1ne Interview with Kary Mullis https://archive.vn/2AY62 Fauci’s First Fraud https://www.bitchute.com/video/t7nJJiOidzQH/
January 19th 2022 VIRUS-ISOLATION IS IT REAL? ANDREW KAUFMAN MD RESPONDS TO JEREMY HAMMOND https://www.bitchute.com/video/UnpfmjmXNH0O/
January 15th 2022 Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/fauci-admits-pcr-test-cannot-detect-infection/
January 10th 2022 Fake Science, Invalid Data: There is No Such Thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. There is No Pandemic https://www.globalresearch.ca/fake-science-invalid-data-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-confirmed-covid-19-case-there-is-no-pandemic/5761960
January 8th 2021 The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-rt-pcr-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-using-a-test-to-lock-down-society/5728483
January 6th 2022 The Identity of the Virus: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification". Freedom of Information Requests. The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”? https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
January 2nd 2022 Harm, a Powerful Banned Documentary on Fraudulent PCR Tests Instantly Went Viral Before Being Deleted https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2022/01/harm-a-powerful-banned-documentary-on-fraudulent-pcr-tests-instantly-went-viral-before-being-deleted-3764636.html
What is a reason of this spam?
If you're getting flak, that means you're over the target.
speaking of flak: unfortunately heavy trolling among the commentariat.
Not exactly. See my post on Project Invisibility. I don't get flack. You can't shoot what you can't see. https://teslaleaks.com/f/weather-wars-w-haarp-project-invisibility-projected-kinetics btw: A Scalar Wave is another way of describing a -longitudinal surface stationary wave where the zero point (where EMF and resistance is reduced towards zero) is the location where energy transfer is at it's maximum- aka a Lamb Wave https://teslaleaks.com/f/wardenclyffe-tower-revisit-chapter-for-peer-review-ft-submarines
Longitudinal Electric Wave... right
can be: similar to standing wave? (which is deadly to any sound/audio recording).
Mike, Andrews comes across here not just as disturbed, but downright jealous—of your credibility, alliances, and the trust you’ve earned. His shifting narratives, wild accusations, and theatrical victimhood read less like truth-telling and more like resentment that you’ve surpassed him. Your response dismantles his claims point by point, leaving little doubt about who’s really “out of control.”
Thank you, Turfseer. That has been my impression as well.
Oh FFS. Sorry you are going through this. So much time spent when I am sure you have research beckoning.
I pray that you give up your obsession with this dumb son of a bitch, Jamie. You're too important to waste your good years agreeing to spar with some cretin who obviously enjoys the process, while you resort to logic to bring him to heel. LOGIC WON'T WORK, BROTHER. Not here.
I’m so sorry, Mike. I honestly haven’t read it. I wish you didn’t feel you had to PAY ATTENTION to his nonsense, validating in the process of doing so. Sometimes silence is louder than words.
Hi Microzyma Pleomorphism,
I did consider not responding to Jamie's article. However, I believe it's important not to let false and libelous claims go unchallenged—especially when they’re so easily refuted with evidence. Hopefully, this puts the matter to rest. I don’t respond to seek attention or validation, only to uphold the truth and protect my name. Thanks for the feedback. 🙂
More evidence that Mike Stone has integrity and understands the importance of the effort to bring the light of truth to the lies of virology.
You are right for he who has the last words is on target the other can no longer substantiate their claim.
Thanks for supplying these details, Mike, it further cements the conclusions i have already reached.
Jamie Andrews is a pathological liar. I'm glad to say that i started suspecting him as soon as i saw his first public interview, when he claimed all sorts of amazing results via alleged lab tests allegedly "proving viruses don't exist," an hypothesis which is impossible to prove in a manner which satisfies the Scientific Method. And these were tests allegedly done by labs whose identity he withheld. Matters regarding him have gone downhill since. I recently noticed he had started "following" my Substack, and moved to block him.
Wow. Sorry.
My husband and I had a similar situation many years ago where we turned the other cheek, as we believed we were supposed to do. We thought that people who knew us would not believe the lies, and others would ask US if they weren’t sure what to think. We found out that people will believe anything you don’t contest.
I hate that you’re having to wade into the filth, but maybe it’s necessary. Who knows
TLDR..... Well, ok, I skimmed enough to see what's going on.... For him/them, Cognitive Dissonance & Confirmation Bias combine to create a false reality....and in that "reality", lies are truth, and truth are lies....
Sorry for you, Mike, BUT, your efforts ARE valuable, and do represent positive forward progress....
KEEP UP THE GOOD WORK!....
Thank you, Bill. 🙂
Hi Mike,
Having been on the inside of this unfortunate storm for a good while now, are you able to make any definitive statements on the scientific "validity" of Jamie's so-called Control Studies Project?
I need to know whether I must remove the content from my "Virology's Fatal Flaw" essay.
After all, just because Jamie is a compulsive and abusive liar, it does not invalidate scientific experiments done by others in another lab that happened to have had the misfortune of being published by him.
Cheers.
Hi J.P.,
While Jamie Andrews’ Virology Control Project is valuable in highlighting the flaws in traditional virology and exposing the pseudoscientific nature of cell culture methods, it does not make Jamie’s work scientific because it still uses the same flawed approach that virologists rely on, failing to adhere to the basic principles of science.
Science is fundamentally about observing natural phenomena—events or processes that occur in the real world—and testing hypotheses to explain them through cause-and-effect relationships. A valid scientific hypothesis must be based on such observed phenomena and be testable in ways that reflect natural conditions.
Jamie’s project does not start from any naturally occurring disease process. Instead, it relies on cytopathogenic effects (CPE)—an artificial laboratory-created phenomenon that arises from manipulating cell cultures under unnatural conditions (such as serum starvation, antibiotics, or other chemical exposures). This effect does not occur in nature and has no direct counterpart in living organisms.
Because the dependent variable in these experiments is an artifact of the lab setup rather than a genuine natural effect, the results do not provide evidence relevant to real-world disease processes. In that sense, Jamie’s work simply reproduces the same pseudoscientific methods used by virologists, showing that CPE can be caused by other factors—but still failing to demonstrate anything about how disease occurs in nature.
Therefore, while the project is helpful for exposing the methodological problems in virology, it does not itself meet the standards of scientific inquiry and would not be considered scientific.
I explain it a bit more in this article:
https://viroliegy.com/2025/05/22/the-mirror-cytopathic-effect/
I think there's a movement to destroy scientific method afoot, with JA an atavar. This lines up with general discard of anything that makes life better for flesh and blood people, in favor of computer takeover, now normalized.
Quick question: Stefan Lanka did a similar experiment a while back - I saw it presented on Katie Sugak’s channel in 2021 or 2022 I think. It seemed to be all about CPE and how it could be induced anyway by the process itself. Would you say that’s not scientific either? I thought it was a good way to show the methodology isn’t sound - testing the method rather than testing a scientific hypothesis if you like
Good question. Lanka’s experiment wasn’t testing a “virus” hypothesis—it was a methodological critique. He showed CPE can occur without a “virus,” exposing that the method itself produces the effect. It’s not a full scientific experiment, but it is a valid falsification of the method virologists rely on.
Thanks Mike! If you don’t mind me asking, why do you use AI to draft your comments?
I was criticized quite a bit for grammatical and spelling errors in the past, so AI became a very convenient way to ensure these were corrected in my articles. I guess it became a bit of a bad habit to use it to correct them in the comments as well. 😉
AH, but this is the crux of the times-''Science is fundamentally about observing natural phenomena''
Well, now it isnt is it, & hasn't been since the INDUSTRIAL REVOLUTION , where it became a form of industry & abuse of nature.
It is now almost entirely concerned with SYNTHETIC phenomena, artificial environments & virtual data interaction for social control /exploitation strategies.
What scientific experiments are you talking about?
''just because Jamie is a compulsive and abusive liar, it does not invalidate scientific experiments done by others in another lab that happened to have had the misfortune of being published by him.'''
And that is precisely why he is doing what he is doing in the way he is.
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
May 16th 2021 "Not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID," she said. "They may have had mild disease but died, for example, of a heart attack." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-walensky-criticism-updated-guidance-coronavirus-deaths
January 21st 2022 a noble Nobel PCR Inventor, Kary Mullis. https://banned.video/watch?id=61eb268a060c640ca547677c -- Originally published this 10/15/2020 and I've since made an even better video about him HERE https://futurenews.news/watch?id=61ab744efe336b045dbcf549 but I thought this was worth uploading here also. sources Crimes Against Humanity https://www.bitchute.com/video/wNuz54BqUgc/ PCR https://youtu.be/QhyaFStJEvU Kary Mullis https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI https://youtu.be/dL3cAS3YUKM https://youtu.be/3OrdJhueROo https://youtu.be/iWOJKuSKw5c https://youtu.be/4VUswvCLMII SPIN.‘SINS OF OMISSION’ https://archive.vn/SN1ne Interview with Kary Mullis https://archive.vn/2AY62 Fauci’s First Fraud https://www.bitchute.com/video/t7nJJiOidzQH/
January 19th 2022 VIRUS-ISOLATION IS IT REAL? ANDREW KAUFMAN MD RESPONDS TO JEREMY HAMMOND https://www.bitchute.com/video/UnpfmjmXNH0O/
January 15th 2022 Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/fauci-admits-pcr-test-cannot-detect-infection/
January 10th 2022 Fake Science, Invalid Data: There is No Such Thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. There is No Pandemic https://www.globalresearch.ca/fake-science-invalid-data-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-confirmed-covid-19-case-there-is-no-pandemic/5761960
January 8th 2021 The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-rt-pcr-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-using-a-test-to-lock-down-society/5728483
January 6th 2022 The Identity of the Virus: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification". Freedom of Information Requests. The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”? https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
January 2nd 2022 Harm, a Powerful Banned Documentary on Fraudulent PCR Tests Instantly Went Viral Before Being Deleted https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2022/01/harm-a-powerful-banned-documentary-on-fraudulent-pcr-tests-instantly-went-viral-before-being-deleted-3764636.html
thanks for compiling that,
I think most folk here know that ConVD 19 is a phantom menace,
that the pharmaceutical combine is a death dealing industry akin to a cult for 'rationalization' fanatics propelled by conceit & greed;
& that the pulverized mess of samples they find their messiahs within are akin to rosharch test blotting paper, dancing into whatever visage the 'ScienTits' wish.
The evasion of AETHERIC influences & reactions is what far too many smug-bugs are missing. 5G tec IS THE ELEPHANT IN THE ROOM, that all these squabbles are desperate to evade because you LIVE IN A AETHERIC ARENA - yet I bet have almost no clue what the AETHER really is or how it manifests & interacts- both externally & internally.
PLASMA is the primary manifestation of AETHER, via the four main formative Ethers & this also will help explain what THE CELL actually is & how its 'membrane/shell/wall' is actually a resonant artifact.
Of course valid but novel ideas attract abuse or intellectual evasion, this is a historical fact- so briefly I will prove my point & anyone here can try & disprove it because this taps into a biofield-centric and energetic systems view of life:
Plasma, as a fourth state of matter, is highly conductive and responsive to electromagnetic fields. It’s used metaphorically (and sometimes literally) in theories of subtle energy and bioelectromagnetics.
The biofield hypothesis suggests that cells are embedded in and shaped by standing wave patterns, not just chemical gradients.
In this view, the “membrane” isn’t a wall — it’s a node of coherence, a resonant interface between scalar fields and biological form.
This aligns with ideas from electrodynamic life theory, where the field both determines and is determined by the particle. The membrane becomes a threshold, not a barrier — a place where form emerges from frequency.
This is a valid re-imagining of phenomenology & cosmology I have been shaping with close friends - here (link ) is a great overview of what we've been devising-https://substack.com/home/post/p-168701689
Speculations about our reality are ok as long as they are presented as such. And it is better not pretend to know what is and what occurs on not perceivable levels of our reality.
What are you trying to say?
Are you under influence of something?
Magic of PCR Genetics Test, Omicron Detection & Bio-Specific VAXX https://nurembergtrials.net/nuremberg-2-0/f/magic-of-pcr-genetics-test-omicron-detection-bio-specific-vaxx Mullis uses Newton's Law for Chemical Reactions & his PCR Test to prove his case: With PCR, it's impossible to detect a whole virus. That's not what it does. 1) In the case of Covid-19, they created the PCR test for Covid-19 before the genetic code for Covid-19 was available 2) Chinese computer code of "novel" Covid-19 was uploaded to Gene Bank; then recently removed at the request of China from the Gene Bank 3) The level of infection; the amount of the virus in your system, called "viral load"; cannot be determined by PCR. 4) PCR only replicates selected genetic markers, and copies them. It does not tell you how much of the genetic material was in the original sample. 5) Nor if the genetic code material "marker" used in the test is unique to "novel" Covid-19 nor "Omicron".
That's Impossible?: It's impossible to separate and isolate a specific "virus" from all other genetic material and microbes from your swabs, then use a PCR genetics test to test for infection, then show how that "virus" caused a specific chemical reaction mechanism in a patient necessary for causation that led to a cause of death. This is where the "died with Covid" vs "died of Covid" meme originated. It's called "covering both bases".
May 16th 2021 "Not all of those 223 cases who had COVID actually died of COVID," she said. "They may have had mild disease but died, for example, of a heart attack." https://www.foxnews.com/politics/cdc-director-walensky-criticism-updated-guidance-coronavirus-deaths
January 21st 2022 a noble Nobel PCR Inventor, Kary Mullis. https://banned.video/watch?id=61eb268a060c640ca547677c -- Originally published this 10/15/2020 and I've since made an even better video about him HERE https://futurenews.news/watch?id=61ab744efe336b045dbcf549 but I thought this was worth uploading here also. sources Crimes Against Humanity https://www.bitchute.com/video/wNuz54BqUgc/ PCR https://youtu.be/QhyaFStJEvU Kary Mullis https://youtu.be/vaMZ4NyNCwI https://youtu.be/dL3cAS3YUKM https://youtu.be/3OrdJhueROo https://youtu.be/iWOJKuSKw5c https://youtu.be/4VUswvCLMII SPIN.‘SINS OF OMISSION’ https://archive.vn/SN1ne Interview with Kary Mullis https://archive.vn/2AY62 Fauci’s First Fraud https://www.bitchute.com/video/t7nJJiOidzQH/
January 19th 2022 VIRUS-ISOLATION IS IT REAL? ANDREW KAUFMAN MD RESPONDS TO JEREMY HAMMOND https://www.bitchute.com/video/UnpfmjmXNH0O/
January 15th 2022 Fauci Admits PCR Test Cannot Detect Infection https://dailyexpose.uk/2022/01/15/fauci-admits-pcr-test-cannot-detect-infection/
January 10th 2022 Fake Science, Invalid Data: There is No Such Thing as a “Confirmed Covid-19 Case”. There is No Pandemic https://www.globalresearch.ca/fake-science-invalid-data-there-is-no-such-thing-as-a-confirmed-covid-19-case-there-is-no-pandemic/5761960
January 8th 2021 The COVID-19 RT-PCR Test: How to Mislead All Humanity. Using a “Test” To Lock Down Society https://www.globalresearch.ca/covid-19-rt-pcr-how-to-mislead-all-humanity-using-a-test-to-lock-down-society/5728483
January 6th 2022 The Identity of the Virus: Health/ Science Institutions Worldwide “Have No Record” of SARS-COV-2 Isolation/Purification". Freedom of Information Requests. The central question raised in this study is the following: is there reliable evidence that SARS-CoV-2 has been isolated from an “unadulterated sample taken from a diseased patient”? https://www.globalresearch.ca/foi-reveal-health-science-institutions-around-world-have-no-record-sars-cov-2-isolation-purification-anywhere-ever/5751969
January 2nd 2022 Harm, a Powerful Banned Documentary on Fraudulent PCR Tests Instantly Went Viral Before Being Deleted https://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2022/01/harm-a-powerful-banned-documentary-on-fraudulent-pcr-tests-instantly-went-viral-before-being-deleted-3764636.html
Do you understand that nucleotides are not proven?
Jamie is a foul mouth, immature, punk.
All it took was to hear the interview with Eric Coppolino.
Nothing more really needs to be said.
Jamie needs ignored.
Nothing he has said or done with respect to his so called experiments has produced anything that was not already known.
I noticed that the Andrews bloke and DPL were mates. I saw the insults thrown at you Mike. I immediately left the scumbags substack.
Discern where to give your energy, attention and value. That is your freedom.
If you contract into such a 'engagement' that has no intent to communicate or extend relational honour or honesty - you may lose your focus - and that is exactly what the stakeholders in weaponised lies intend.
Let your work be your witness.
Use the pressure of such a 'trap' to provide the momentum to release your 'trigger points'.
How are we 'infected' by hacking or hijacking bait& provocation but via 'back doors' we otherwise didn't fully recognise as a liability.
If people are not honest - disengage.
Of course the stakeholders include anyone who gets a boost of 'meaning' to their life from engaging in the narratives for such purpose. They don't have to be controlled op to be part of the fog.
You think rationally demonstrable evidences are enough to change the mind of others, but while there is merit in revealing fraudulent, specious or fallacious claims relevant to destructive control agenda, you might realise that desire for truth is rare in a world of lies - or to put it another way - of vested and defended self illusion.
Let the dead bury the dead - attend the Living.
If something is serious, consider litigation, but not as personal vengeance or you'd be better off releasing everything to live a whole life - anyway - and any way.