Nov 7, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

Invisibility is a special property. It presupposes our inability to locate, find, identify, capture, extract, store, manage while in storage, measure, dose, re-use, track behavior, verify against anything else, immobilize, neutralize, disable, modify, describe, photograph, characterize, classify, archive… anything else?

How come we hypnotize others and ourselves to believe stories in the face of this all? Why don’t we first solve the mystery of a “missing” sense?

This is not about extremely minute dimensions - these are not invisible, we only are not designed to perceive the smallest things. You should ask yourself a question: If we are not designed to see these ultra-miniature things, may it be reasonable to conclude that they are not dangerous to us? The theory goes that we supposedly are superbeings, the peak of evolution. If this is true, and we have no microscopic eyes, maybe we don’t need them? Maybe we don’t need them because there is nothing miniature to fear or to worry about?

Expand full comment
Nov 11, 2023Liked by Mike Stone

You could have also discussed Fredricks and Relman - Reconsideration of Koch’s Postulates?

Expand full comment

Wow! So we had the definition incorrect this whole time?! They are not intracellular obligate parasites?! I will have to redo my exhaustive definition in my Virology's Fatal Flaw essay?!


Expand full comment

Thanks very good information. Bechamp wrote 160 years ago that flying viruses or 'germs' did not exist. Is a virus a germ, is a germ a virus? Bechamp simply asked Pasteur and 'the science' to show him a flying germ with dna material of said disease. 160 years later nothing.

Virus hocus pocus. Viruses for smallpox, diptheria, typhoid, rabies etc etc. never proven to exist. Pleomorphic bacteria cause disease and billions exist in our own bodies.

Expand full comment

Have you heard Dr. Malone's fairytale about how dead particles called viruses become alive?


Expand full comment
Dec 20, 2023·edited Dec 20, 2023

Mike - Thank you for sharing this story of THE NATURE OF VIRUSES - by THOMAS M. RIVERS - from

The Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, New York & the other related stack articles & info here.

I didn't know of him at all & I've been following all of the no-germ/no-virus folks over the past 3+ yrs.

Think below article is a good addition to your stack here as it shows again how obvious illnesses are explained to the public as "viruses" that everyone can catch rather than regular bacterial processes OR mass poisonings that deserve to be criminally prosecuted. Oftentimes, convenient govt/farma fraud around toxins & the PTB's "slight of hand" regarding the poisons (look over there) to fool the marks.

Toxicology vs Virology: The Rockefeller Institute and the Criminal Polio Fraud - By F. William Engdahl

Global Research, July 14, 2022


Excerpt:: "One of the outcomes of the alleged new SARS Covid virus that publicly emerged in 2019 is that the medical specialization of virology has been raised to a stature almost Godlike in the media. Few understand the origins of virology and its elevation into a leading role in today’s medicine practice. For this we need to look at the origins and politics of America’s first medical research institute, the Rockefeller Institute for Medical Research, today Rockefeller University, and their work on what they claimed was a polio virus."

"In 1907 an outbreak of a sickness in New York City gave the director of the Rockefeller Institute, Simon Flexner, MD, a golden opportunity to lay claim to discovery of an invisible “virus” caused by what was arbitrarily called poliomyelitis. The word poliomyelitis simply means inflammation of the spinal cord’s grey matter. There were some 2,500 New Yorkers, mostly children, designated with some form of poliomyelitis, including paralysis and even death, that year."

"In a paper published in 1909 in the Journal of the American Medical Association, Flexner claimed he and Lewis had isolated the poliomyelitis virus responsible. He reported they had successfully “passaged” poliomyelitis through several monkeys, from monkey to monkey. They began by injecting diseased human spinal cord tissue of a young boy who had died, presumably from the virus, into the brains of monkeys. After a monkey fell ill, a suspension of its diseased spinal cord tissue was injected into the brains of other monkeys who also fell ill."

"They proclaimed that the Rockefeller Institute doctors had thus proven poliomyelitis virus causality for the mysterious disease. They hadn’t done anything of the sort. Flexner and Lewis even admitted that:

“We failed utterly to discover bacteria, either in film preparations or in cultures, that could account for the disease; and, since among our long series of propagations of the virus in monkeys not one animal showed, in the lesions, the cocci described by some previous investigators, and we had failed to obtain any such bacteria from the human material studied by us, we felt that they could be excluded from consideration.”

"What they then did was to make a bizarre supposition, a leap of faith, not a scientific claim. They took their hypothesis of viral exogenous agency and made it fact, with no proof whatever. They asserted: “Therefore, …the infecting agent of epidemic poliomyelitis belongs to the class of the minute and filterable viruses that have not thus far been demonstrated with certainty under the microscope.“ Therefore?"

Thanks so much for everything you do to educate & inform us re: the massive germs/viruses fraud.

Expand full comment