Investments. These people are ideologically invested in the virology narrative, they have believed it all their lives, doggedly cling to it. They are emotionally invested, fearing that any admission of being fundamentally wrong about it would undermine their legitimacy among their followers, given how often and repeatedly they have spewed this narrative to their fans. And more than a few of them are themselves financially invested in this narrative, offering "alternative treatments" to "viruses," or their sponsors/funders are. That's the hidden agenda.
The germ theory team keeps playing whack a mole in the courts while the truth that the emperor has no clothes brings down the whole house of cards. Then knowing the Rockefeller medicine lie helps everyone wonder what else they’ve been lied to about bringing down the criminal activities of the psychopaths trying to gain control. The big myth needs big exposure. Perhaps they are not up to the task.
So Derrick sees belief in politics as not-solution-focused... yet chose to run for Mayor of Houston anyways. Interesting. And according to Derrick, pumping people up without any solutions "feels" solution-focused. I think I'm noticing a pattern with Derrick, pivoting to "feelings" when he has nothing logical to say.
Yes, lets leave the foundation of this house of cards intact! Lets give the Pharmaceutical mafia a continuing reason to exist. Let's equip future generations with unending fear of The Germ. There's a solution worth fighting for! /s
I used to subscribe to Derrick Broze's Telegram channel, and a few months ago he brought up something about "the virus" and I replied with a very mild disagreement and summary of why I do not believe that viruses exist. Several other people responded in support of what I wrote. Derrick argued, bringing up the "terrain and germ theory can both be true" notion, which I countered, and after a brief exchange he closed off the topic by saying that this discussion wasn't relevant to his page (even though he brought it up in the first place). He has done some great work, but his attitude seems to easily devolve to "I'm taking my ball and going home" when he feels like he is losing the game.
People like Broze and Bigtree are "career politicians" and warrior opportunists, not sincere researchers or teachers that have the slightest handle on solving this huge germ theory hoax mess that has allowed tyrants to completely derail human freedom and autonomy, not to mention common sense and awareness of reality. The reality is that you and you alone make yourself sick via your own voluntary lifestyle; primarily your diet in this modern century. Anyone who actually changes (not token alters) their diet over time (the only real experiment towards actual health, which is the elimination of all symptoms of dis-ease) can put the germ theory to rest once and for all. The trouble is that hardly anyone does this- instead they choose to pander to their social audiences hoping to increase their "sales value" for all kinds of products or services that support survival amidst the chaos. But there would be no chaos once everyone had a working understanding of what the germ theory of "infectious disease and contagion" and disease really was, and how simple it is to squash it. Of course, then all the Brozes and Bigtrees would be out of a job. Those who ACTUALLY educate the public, like Mike Stone and a tiny handful or others do not consider this their job. We all consider it our duty to humanity, money or no money, fame or no fame, notoriety or no notoriety.
Jun 16, 2023·edited Jun 16, 2023Liked by Mike Stone
Mike you are in the top ten of medical freedom fighters including Rappoport, Massey, Dr. Bailey and Celia Farber. In the unlikely event the tyrants were ever put on trial, you should be the number one witness against them in terms of scientific knowledge.
What is so difficult pushing back against germ theory is that the average person is content in accepting simplistic solutions to explain the cause of illness. The medical cartel has always known this.
To my mind the mainstream narrative has not only been about proffering simplistic explanations but outright laziness in thinking things through. They are lazy people who see themselves as saints!
Jun 16, 2023·edited Jun 17, 2023Liked by Mike Stone
What do the Chinese say? Did they really allow the Americans and their spies create a very dangerous viral pathogen in their territory? Are the Chinese that dumb and weak?
The Americans know the Chinese will never tell the truth about bioweapons research, which is why the virus is a cover story to never speak about what they really do, which has to do with poisons and antidotes.
I heard Del Bigtree's speech at VaxCon 23 back in April. He and at least one other highlighted speaker at that conference dismissed the "no virus" idea as absurd/ unimportant/ wrong (I really don't want to put words in their mouths; at the very least they expressed a negative view of it.) On the other hand, he and several of the other speakers went into great detail about how the respected scientific journals are often just plain wrong, and particularly how they have been wrong on top of wrong about various aspects of "covid." They had numerous slides showing screen shots from those journals, in order to show how they were contradictory and just wrong.
I was struck by the huge disconnect: they distrust, and are telling their followers to distrust those journals, when it comes to what they have to say about covid illness, its seriousness and "spread"; about the "safety and efficacy" of the shots, even about the basic value of vaccines in general (I think it was Pierre Kory who implied that). Yet, they accept at face value, without analyzing the articles or the studies that the articles report on, the ones titled "Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 ...."
They seem to be comfortable critiquing the articles that are based on statistics, but not the ones claiming to be based on science. It's really disappointing and unfortunate.
I had an exchange with Broze and I pointed him to the Lanka control experiment.
That's the experiment that scientifically confirmed it for me, as the controls had the same results as the viral cultures.
He said that he finds it interesting, but still isn't sure.
I took a while to understand why that was not enough for him to look deeper, as he and Ryan from TLAV pretend to know terrain theory while spouting incorrect statements such as "terrain doesn't believe in bacteria" etc.... Obviously they have little knowledge of terrain stating things that terrain never said!
And then I realized it... They're fence sitters.
They're so lazy that they cannot choose what is most logical because the crowd still believes in germ theory.
Follow the money! Both the drug cartels and the "help, save us from evil Chinese bioweapons" crowd make money from selling fear. That's where the biggest market is. Unfortunately, logic - even if it’s blindingly obvious - doesn't sell that well. We need to take a leaf from the much (unfairly) maligned Chinese and Russian playbook and be prepared to play the 'long game'.
Great work as always, Mike. I like what Christine Massey says. We need to ask the "yes-virus" people, "upon what science do you depend, to support your claims"?
The way Derrick conducts himself when challenged speaks for itself - particularly in this article by Proton Magic, and particularly in his responses to Proton, ET, and myself. He tends to resort to calling us "dumb fucks" over and over and over (mind you, none of us crossed the line with him once, and we didn't resort to childish name-calling).
I dont think Derrick is genuine, whatsoever. And this is coming from someone who used to be a fan of and respect his work. I've been observing his behavior the last few years when challenged by others (most extreme is his response to Allison McDowell, who pushes his buttons occasionally - and I dont necessarily agree with everything she says either.... )
I find it quite amusing that someone who preaches about "Exit and Build", yet is running for Mayor, can't handle a little pushback... hes gonna do just fine running for political office 🙄 the irony of that statement is absurd, and I made a point to bring that up in my replies to the post below. ("Exit the system", while also engaging in it DIRECTLY and running for political office lol). Apparently that triggered him further, which wasn't even my intent. But my god that dude has a short fuse and an obvious anger management problem.
No evidence for transmissible disease as it never happened in experiments, thus viruses have never been proven to not exist by definition (or, so what would you still like to call a virus?), might be a better way to start the 'no virus' discussion with people who have a hard time to imagine viruses do not exist.
.
The believe viruses exist is a real virus, so viruses do not exist physically, as they are a mental construct (a real idea) would be correct.
.
Here is a list of experiments which failed to prove contagion or transmissible disease exists:
Seems that Derrick often pivots to insults to avoid backing up his "not essential" claims. And he seems terribly confused. Asking for an answer is not equivalent to believing that you deserve "privileges"!
If I heard a politician say that, or heard them dismissing an entire movement of people - with admittedly valid concerns - as "rabid", I'd conclude they were either crooked or nuts. And claiming that it's not essential to learn what does and doesn't make us ill, and that safe quackcines are an impossibility... that's just bizarre.
Investments. These people are ideologically invested in the virology narrative, they have believed it all their lives, doggedly cling to it. They are emotionally invested, fearing that any admission of being fundamentally wrong about it would undermine their legitimacy among their followers, given how often and repeatedly they have spewed this narrative to their fans. And more than a few of them are themselves financially invested in this narrative, offering "alternative treatments" to "viruses," or their sponsors/funders are. That's the hidden agenda.
The germ theory team keeps playing whack a mole in the courts while the truth that the emperor has no clothes brings down the whole house of cards. Then knowing the Rockefeller medicine lie helps everyone wonder what else they’ve been lied to about bringing down the criminal activities of the psychopaths trying to gain control. The big myth needs big exposure. Perhaps they are not up to the task.
So Derrick sees belief in politics as not-solution-focused... yet chose to run for Mayor of Houston anyways. Interesting. And according to Derrick, pumping people up without any solutions "feels" solution-focused. I think I'm noticing a pattern with Derrick, pivoting to "feelings" when he has nothing logical to say.
Yes, lets leave the foundation of this house of cards intact! Lets give the Pharmaceutical mafia a continuing reason to exist. Let's equip future generations with unending fear of The Germ. There's a solution worth fighting for! /s
I used to subscribe to Derrick Broze's Telegram channel, and a few months ago he brought up something about "the virus" and I replied with a very mild disagreement and summary of why I do not believe that viruses exist. Several other people responded in support of what I wrote. Derrick argued, bringing up the "terrain and germ theory can both be true" notion, which I countered, and after a brief exchange he closed off the topic by saying that this discussion wasn't relevant to his page (even though he brought it up in the first place). He has done some great work, but his attitude seems to easily devolve to "I'm taking my ball and going home" when he feels like he is losing the game.
People like Broze and Bigtree are "career politicians" and warrior opportunists, not sincere researchers or teachers that have the slightest handle on solving this huge germ theory hoax mess that has allowed tyrants to completely derail human freedom and autonomy, not to mention common sense and awareness of reality. The reality is that you and you alone make yourself sick via your own voluntary lifestyle; primarily your diet in this modern century. Anyone who actually changes (not token alters) their diet over time (the only real experiment towards actual health, which is the elimination of all symptoms of dis-ease) can put the germ theory to rest once and for all. The trouble is that hardly anyone does this- instead they choose to pander to their social audiences hoping to increase their "sales value" for all kinds of products or services that support survival amidst the chaos. But there would be no chaos once everyone had a working understanding of what the germ theory of "infectious disease and contagion" and disease really was, and how simple it is to squash it. Of course, then all the Brozes and Bigtrees would be out of a job. Those who ACTUALLY educate the public, like Mike Stone and a tiny handful or others do not consider this their job. We all consider it our duty to humanity, money or no money, fame or no fame, notoriety or no notoriety.
Mike you are in the top ten of medical freedom fighters including Rappoport, Massey, Dr. Bailey and Celia Farber. In the unlikely event the tyrants were ever put on trial, you should be the number one witness against them in terms of scientific knowledge.
What is so difficult pushing back against germ theory is that the average person is content in accepting simplistic solutions to explain the cause of illness. The medical cartel has always known this.
To my mind the mainstream narrative has not only been about proffering simplistic explanations but outright laziness in thinking things through. They are lazy people who see themselves as saints!
A man takes the virus as his bride. Watch Turfseer’s music video ONE TRICK PONY. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/one-trick-pony
BONUS: Free PDF Download. BEST OF SUBSTACK VOLUME 1. Gems culled from Best Substacks with links to the full article. https://turfseer.substack.com/p/best-of-substack-volume-1
What do the Chinese say? Did they really allow the Americans and their spies create a very dangerous viral pathogen in their territory? Are the Chinese that dumb and weak?
The Americans know the Chinese will never tell the truth about bioweapons research, which is why the virus is a cover story to never speak about what they really do, which has to do with poisons and antidotes.
I heard Del Bigtree's speech at VaxCon 23 back in April. He and at least one other highlighted speaker at that conference dismissed the "no virus" idea as absurd/ unimportant/ wrong (I really don't want to put words in their mouths; at the very least they expressed a negative view of it.) On the other hand, he and several of the other speakers went into great detail about how the respected scientific journals are often just plain wrong, and particularly how they have been wrong on top of wrong about various aspects of "covid." They had numerous slides showing screen shots from those journals, in order to show how they were contradictory and just wrong.
I was struck by the huge disconnect: they distrust, and are telling their followers to distrust those journals, when it comes to what they have to say about covid illness, its seriousness and "spread"; about the "safety and efficacy" of the shots, even about the basic value of vaccines in general (I think it was Pierre Kory who implied that). Yet, they accept at face value, without analyzing the articles or the studies that the articles report on, the ones titled "Isolation of SARS-CoV-2 ...."
They seem to be comfortable critiquing the articles that are based on statistics, but not the ones claiming to be based on science. It's really disappointing and unfortunate.
I had an exchange with Broze and I pointed him to the Lanka control experiment.
That's the experiment that scientifically confirmed it for me, as the controls had the same results as the viral cultures.
He said that he finds it interesting, but still isn't sure.
I took a while to understand why that was not enough for him to look deeper, as he and Ryan from TLAV pretend to know terrain theory while spouting incorrect statements such as "terrain doesn't believe in bacteria" etc.... Obviously they have little knowledge of terrain stating things that terrain never said!
And then I realized it... They're fence sitters.
They're so lazy that they cannot choose what is most logical because the crowd still believes in germ theory.
They suffer what is explained here: https://www.simplypsychology.org/kuhn-paradigm.html
Follow the money! Both the drug cartels and the "help, save us from evil Chinese bioweapons" crowd make money from selling fear. That's where the biggest market is. Unfortunately, logic - even if it’s blindingly obvious - doesn't sell that well. We need to take a leaf from the much (unfairly) maligned Chinese and Russian playbook and be prepared to play the 'long game'.
Great work as always, Mike. I like what Christine Massey says. We need to ask the "yes-virus" people, "upon what science do you depend, to support your claims"?
The way Derrick conducts himself when challenged speaks for itself - particularly in this article by Proton Magic, and particularly in his responses to Proton, ET, and myself. He tends to resort to calling us "dumb fucks" over and over and over (mind you, none of us crossed the line with him once, and we didn't resort to childish name-calling).
I dont think Derrick is genuine, whatsoever. And this is coming from someone who used to be a fan of and respect his work. I've been observing his behavior the last few years when challenged by others (most extreme is his response to Allison McDowell, who pushes his buttons occasionally - and I dont necessarily agree with everything she says either.... )
I find it quite amusing that someone who preaches about "Exit and Build", yet is running for Mayor, can't handle a little pushback... hes gonna do just fine running for political office 🙄 the irony of that statement is absurd, and I made a point to bring that up in my replies to the post below. ("Exit the system", while also engaging in it DIRECTLY and running for political office lol). Apparently that triggered him further, which wasn't even my intent. But my god that dude has a short fuse and an obvious anger management problem.
https://protonmagic.substack.com/p/isolated-terrain/comments#comment-17286283
No evidence for transmissible disease as it never happened in experiments, thus viruses have never been proven to not exist by definition (or, so what would you still like to call a virus?), might be a better way to start the 'no virus' discussion with people who have a hard time to imagine viruses do not exist.
.
The believe viruses exist is a real virus, so viruses do not exist physically, as they are a mental construct (a real idea) would be correct.
.
Here is a list of experiments which failed to prove contagion or transmissible disease exists:
https://dpl003.substack.com/p/virology-the-damning-evidence
Another great article, Mike, as always!
Seems that Derrick often pivots to insults to avoid backing up his "not essential" claims. And he seems terribly confused. Asking for an answer is not equivalent to believing that you deserve "privileges"!
If I heard a politician say that, or heard them dismissing an entire movement of people - with admittedly valid concerns - as "rabid", I'd conclude they were either crooked or nuts. And claiming that it's not essential to learn what does and doesn't make us ill, and that safe quackcines are an impossibility... that's just bizarre.
Well written Mike and in case you weren't aware, I have covered some of the misconceptions that Derrick Broze et al got at the moment in this article.
My attempt to address some misconceptions
https://johnblaid.substack.com/p/my-attempt-to-address-some-misconceptions