The Uncovering the Corona Fraud series is an extra benefit for paid subscribers. It is made up of old Facebook posts that I did on various articles and studies throughout the last few years of the “pandemic.” I provide updated commentary to go along with each of the included posts. This series is an effort to review and learn from the past in order to avoid repeating the mistakes in the present and future.
As we rolled into the first “Summer of “SARS-COV-2,” there were competing stories about the damage that protesting, as spurred by the death of George Floyd, would do with the “threat” of the “virus” still present. Would protesting lead to super-spreader events increasing “infections,” or were people safe from the “virus” while outdoors? Did the “virus” only attack those who were in crowded spaces indoors? An irrational happy medium was settled upon where people were “safe” from the “virus” outdoors if they were protesting the police. However, they were “unsafe” from the “virus” if they were outside protesting quarantines, lockdowns, and stay-at-home orders. The highest “risk” was for those who gathered inside at churches.
As businesses began to reopen, the threat of increased cases was circulating like wildfires in the media. However, what they failed to account for was the increase in fraudulent mass testing that was driving the increases of cases. Free mobile testing clinics, easier access to drive-thru clinics, expanding testing to include those outside “high-risk” groups, and forced mandatory testing in places such as meatpacking plants and prisons drove up the case count as anyone and everyone was being tested. Cases were based upon the positive PCR result regardless of whether one was actually sick or not. In the vast majority of the cases identified by mandatory mass testing, the cases were almost all asymptomatic, i.e. healthy and free of disease.
While stories on the above events were interesting and are recounted below, what really caught my attention during the first week in June 2020 were articles admitting that the images of “SARS-COV-2” utilized to sell the public on the threat of the invisible “virus” were simply artist renderings. It was stated that just a few years ago, all they had were cartoons or artistic representations. This is because the CDC has its own art department that creates images of “viruses” in order to sell the public on the “threat” that they could not see. The images were created to “grab the public’s attention.” To do so, they utilized a piece of software called Autodesk 3ds Max, which was said to be “where all the magic happens.” The aim was to make the “viruses” look like they’re really alive so that the public knew to be aware of them. It was admitted that the high-resolution graphic of “SARS-COV-2” on the CDC's website is “partially artistic.” Essentially, it is all marketing and branding to convince people of a non-existence “threat.”
This is not just limited to the images of “SARS-COV-2” like that seen in the title of this article. The images of the “real virus” are composites made up of 100,000 scanning electron microscope images put together via computer algorithms. With the emergence of better computational methods, they convert thousands of 2D images into a single reconstructed 3D map. These works of art are used to allow people to visualize the fictional entities claimed to be making them sick. The new technology also helps to continue to fool researchers into believing that they are capturing images of the mythical unicorns, when in fact, they are doing nothing of the sort. In reality, what they are doing is taking images of random particles from unpurified fluids. They admittedly are unable to tell images of “SARS-COV-2” apart from different “coronaviruses,” “exosomes,” and other extracellular vesicles. All they are doing is pointing-and-declaring at the same particles while giving them different names.
For more on the trickery involved in electron microscopy, please refer to these articles.
Beyond pieces detailing the ability to dodge the “virus” by protesting the police, the rise of cases due to increased mass testing, and the CDC's art gallery, you will other very interesting stories such as:
Admittances by Italy's top “experts” that the “virus” was weakening
A look at a potential 2014 trial run involving protests and the emergence of a “virus”
An attempt to change “SARS-COV-2” from a respiratory to a blood-borne “virus”
A 2017 study that uncovered hidden dangerous substances in vaccines
A look at the ever-changing narrative surrounding whether one healthy person could make another healthy person sick
And more!
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to ViroLIEgy Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.