Uncovering the Corona Fraud Part 21

June 23rd, 2020 to June 30th, 2020

It seemed rather obvious to me before the “pandemic” that a major factor driving people to experience signs and symptoms of respiratory disease was the quality of the air that we breath in on a regular basis. I was already well aware of the growing problem of persistent contrails, a.k.a. chemtrails, and the damaging impact that these lingering artificial clouds brought to our health and to the environment. Amongst other harmful pollutants, these trails contain PM_2.5 (particles smaller than 2.5 μm in diameter), which the WHO estimated in 2016 that 4.2 million deaths could be attributed annually to this fine particulate matter air pollution. I knew that, in many parts of the world, our air pollution levels were only increasing, leading to worsening outcomes for many people. In fact, in June 2020, six months after the emergence of the “pandemic,” an article published in the prestigious journal Nature came out stating that half of the world's population was exposed to increasing levels of air pollution. Thus, when the “pandemic” of respiratory symptoms “broke out” in highly polluted cities such as Wuhan, China, Bergamo, Italy, and New York City, it was evident that the disease stemmed from the usual source with the most likely culprit in air pollution being relegated to a co-factor in order to push the fear-based propaganda of a novel pathogen.

As the “pandemic” moved along, this connection became even clearer, with “viral” RNA being found in air pollution samples while cases of the disease were linked to those exposed consistently to the highest levels of polluted air for the longest periods of time. To make this connection even stronger, when air pollution levels subsided during lockdowns and travel restrictions, “Covid” cases fell. However, when the lockdowns and restrictions were lifted and air pollution levels began to rise due to increased travel, “Covid” cases began to rise again. While this rise is also due to the increase in mass testing, the fact was that people experienced more signs and symptoms of respiratory disease in times of higher pollution, thus driving them to get tested for these symptoms leading to a rise in cases.

While I won't rehash everything here, I have written a few articles linking air pollution and chemtrails to increasing respiratory symptoms of disease. I also took a look at the recent increase in man-made wild fires that seems to have coincided with the “pandemic,” leading to worsening air quality alerts throughout many parts of the world. There are various sources of pollution within our atmosphere that are contributing to this decline:

• mobile sources – such as cars, buses, planes, trucks, and trains

• stationary sources – such as power plants, oil refineries, industrial facilities, and factories

• area sources – such as agricultural areas, cities, and wood burning fireplaces

• natural sources – such as wind-blown dust, wildfires, and volcanoes

Each of these sources of pollutants have an impact upon our health and environment, the true extent of which we may never know. However, to either deny, ignore, or minimize the negative health impacts in order to put the entire focus on fictional pathogenic entities as the explanation for symptoms of respiratory disease is pure insanity. We are chasing the wrong enemy while applying the wrong solution, and we will continue to see diminishing returns from our misguided actions. If we want to rid ourselves of a major source of respiratory distress, we need to focus our efforts on the most influential factor leading to this distress by cleaning up our air in order to improve our overall quality of life.

Beyond a few posts related to the link between air pollution, respiratory disease, and “Covid,” there are posts closing out the month of June that:

• investigate the fraudulent PCR tests

• spotlight the continued manipulation by the mainstream media

• highlight the pseudoscientific indirect evidence used to promote a fake “pandemic”

• break down the continued addition of more symptoms to the “Covid” brand

• point out the contradictory information that torpedoes the official narrative

• examines the potential “viral threats” that are being primed for a potential future “pandemic”

And much more! It was an interesting end to a very busy month.