When I started my journey into uncovering the “virus” lie, my gateway into this area of research was the fraudulent HIV/AIDS paradigm. I began exploring HIV due to a family member who was misdiagnosed by way of antibody and PCR tests that were admitted to being unsuitable for diagnosing HIV infection by the manufacturers themselves:
“The pharmaceutical corporations that manufacture and commercialize these test kits acknowledge the inaccuracy of the tests. This explains the seemingly surprising statement included in the kit inserts: "Elisa testing alone cannot be used to diagnose AIDS, even if the recommended investigation of reactive specimens suggests a high probability that the antibody to HIV-1 is present" (Abbott 1997).
The insert for one of the kits for administering the Western blot warns: "Do not use this kit as the sole basis of diagnosis of HIV-1 infection" (Epitope Organon Teknika).
In like manner, the insert that accompanies a very frequently used test for PCR Viral Load warns: "the Amplicor HIV-1 Monitor test is not intended to be used as a screening test for HIV or as a diagnostic test to confirm the presence of HIV infection" (Roche 2003).
Therefore, the pharmaceutical drug manufacturers acknowledge the fact that neither the ELISA, nor the Western blot, nor the Viral Load tests for HIV are specific to diagnosis HIV infection.”
I later found out that there were over 70 conditions that could trigger a positive HIV antibody test result, two of which my relative was said to be suffering from.
As the testing domino fell, it led me to investigate HIV itself. Fortunately, many brave individuals such as the Perth Group, Dr. Stefan Lanka, David Crowe, and numerous others had already paved the path for me and all I had to do was confirm their evidence and conclusions for myself. This led to the major “virus” domino falling for me which in turn knocked down the next “virus” and the next, so on and so forth.
Understanding the deceptive tricks utilized with HIVAIDS was extremely valuable in regard to uncovering the “Corona” fraud as the same tricks were employed, even down to the same main player in Anthony Fauci. With “Covid,” we could once again see fraudulent tests being used to label individuals with a “virus” that had never been shown to exist directly within the fluids nor proven pathogenic via adherence to the scientific method. We had inconsistent antibody results which were theorized to mean that either one was immune for some period of time or, as with HIV, one would suffer from severe disease. The antibody tests were known to be inaccurate, and experts warned that these tests should not be used for diagnostic purposes, yet the FDA still rushed them out onto the market. Just as we saw with HIV, the letters accompanying the “Covid” tests admitted that they should not be used as the sole basis for diagnosis. Even the PCR tests were said not to be able to detect “infectious virus” or state that what was identified was the cause of disease. This was even seen with the PCR tests used in previous epidemics such as Zika, MERS, and the H1N1 Swine flu. Thus, just as in the case with HIV, we had a Testing Pandemic fraudulently labeling individuals with symptoms of disease lumped together under an umbrella term.
I explored many of these aspects in the posts below, along with looking at how the 6-feet rule was created as well as how the fraudulent statistics were generated, examining the inconsistent immune system messaging by so-called “experts,” looking at evidence that the Gates Foundation was poisoning children in both Africa and India, and highlighting the growing community of medical experts speaking out against the mainstream narrative. Oh, and there was yet another ridiculous symptom added to the “Covid” umbrella that I had some fun with as well. 😉
Keep reading with a 7-day free trial
Subscribe to ViroLIEgy Newsletter to keep reading this post and get 7 days of free access to the full post archives.