Uncovering the Corona Fraud Part 24

July 14th, 2020 to July 22nd, 2020

The Uncovering the Corona Fraud series is an extra benefit for paid subscribers. It is made up of old Facebook posts that I did on various articles and studies throughout the last few years of the “pandemic.” I provide updated commentary to go along with each of the included posts. This series is an effort to review and learn from the past in order to avoid repeating the mistakes in the present and future.

While I have written much on the ineffectiveness of mask use, their potential harm to physical health, and the troubling symbolism involved in their use (covered in UTCF part 12 and part 22), one of my strongest motivations for keeping my son’s face free of any covering came from a deeper understanding of the psychological toll such conformity could have on him—both in the moment and long into the future. Even a seemingly simple act like wearing a mask can leave a lasting imprint on a child’s developing identity and autonomy. It teaches a child early on that fear is normal, that obedience to authority is virtue, and that your face—and by extension, your feelings—must be hidden for the good of others. That’s why I resisted it at every turn. I would not allow a symbol of fear and submission to be affixed to his face—physically or psychologically.

In a time when many surrendered to fear, peer pressure, or institutional mandates, I chose to stand firm—not just for principle’s sake, but for my child’s mental and emotional well-being. That decision came with tradeoffs. His schooling was disrupted the following year and was done virtually. But it was a small price to pay to show him that calm resistance in the face of irrationality can be the most courageous act of all. What mattered more than short-term convenience was the long-term message: that critical thinking, bodily autonomy, and emotional integrity are not up for negotiation.

As much as I possibly could, I ensured there was no “new normal” for my son. His life would be as it always was. I refused to let him grow up in a world where masked faces were standard, where social distance replaced human connection, and where fear dictated every decision.

We are now seeing the psychological costs of these measures confirmed by a growing body of research. Face masks, for instance, have been shown to interfere with a child’s ability to read facial expressions and emotional cues—critical skills for empathy, communication, and healthy attachment during early development. According to a study from Utrecht University, infants born during the “pandemic” struggled to recognize emotions, suggesting a disruption in normal social development. As noted by Psychology Today, masking may hinder “emotion recognition,” especially in children aged 3–5, potentially leading to long-term social confusion and diminished emotional intelligence.

But the masks were only part of the problem. Social distancing and isolation compounded the issue. One study published in ScienceDirect found that lockdowns and distancing correlated with increased anxiety, depression, irritability, and symptoms of post-traumatic stress in children. Another, in the Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, reported elevated rates of emotional and behavioral problems across every age group during “Covid” restrictions. In New South Wales, Australia, a dramatic rise in school suspensions for young children was directly attributed to the behavioral consequences of extended isolation and disrupted development.

The academic and developmental fallout was equally profound. A global analysis of 71 education systems found an average learning decline of 0.11 standard deviations—particularly in math and science—with the steepest losses in regions that enforced the longest school closures. In England, projections suggest the current generation may face the worst exam results in decades, with potential lifetime earnings losses estimated at $31 billion. Meanwhile, a study out of Brown University found that children born during the “pandemic” scored significantly lower on measures of verbal, motor, and cognitive performance compared to those born before. The anecdotal reports mirrored the data: children returning to school still in diapers, struggling to speak, and unable to engage in basic social interaction, as also noted by Utrecht University.

These were not small sacrifices. These were deep wounds inflicted on childhood itself. And they were made in the name of safety—yet few ever paused to ask what kind of future we were actually making “safe” for our children.

If more parents had drawn this line—had insisted on preserving normalcy, connection, and freedom—perhaps we could have prevented the institutionalization of fear and obedience now being quietly embraced by the next generation. The “new normal” didn’t just mask faces; it masked a deeper truth: that children need freedom, interaction, expression, and joy far more than they need forced “protection” from an invisible threat they barely understand.

And they need parents who are willing to stand in the gap and say no more!

Alongside several posts detailing the dangers of masking, you’ll also find:

• Evidence that the so-called “surge” was manufactured through the misuse of notoriously unreliable PCR testing and statistical sleight of hand.

• An “immunity expert” flipping the script on “natural immunity” to explain why people were getting “reinfected”—despite supposedly being protected.

• What EUA test package inserts actually reveal—for those willing to read the fine print.

• A breakdown of the absurd “asymptomatic” and “presymptomatic” transmission narratives.

• Cases of symptomatic and hospitalized individuals testing negative by PCR—proving the disconnect between test results and actual illness.

• Symbolism in mainstream media narratives that promoted fear and compliance.

• The manufactured coin shortage—justified by the “pandemic”—used to nudge society toward a cashless system.

• A hilarious example of blatant social conditioning from a widely read mainstream outlet.

• The 99% Club.

• Teen deaths dubiously attributed to “SARS-COV-2” rather than underlying health issues.

• And, of course, some appropriately pointed memes, as well as much more!