Uncovering the Corona Fraud Part 7

April 1st, 2020 to April 5th, 2020

As we enter into 2023, we have finally made it to the beginning of April 2020 in this journey into uncovering the corona fraud. As I “predicted,” it was a rather big month as far as the output of my posts as well as the amount of information coming at us fast and furiously about this “virus” and its impact. We started to witness the economic toll that the lockdowns and restrictions were having as unemployment rates began to soar. To myself and others, this seemed like a planned attack to not only make things much more difficult and stressful on the public but also as a way to increase fear in an imaginary “viral” threat. We were to believe that this “virus” wasn't only hurting us physically but financially as well, even though this outcome was the direct result of the overreaction by those in charge based upon fraudulent statistical modeling.

Fortunately, as is often the case when lies continue to drag on and become too large to handle, more cracks in the overall narrative began to appear. We witnessed the abandonment of the “herd immunity” lie that had been used for so long to pressure the hesitant into getting vaccinated. While the UK wanted to let the people get “infected naturally” in order to build up “herd immunity,” this outcome was declared far too dangerous based on the fraudulent modeling data. “Herd immunity” was quickly pushed aside once the “experts” decided that lockdowns and restrictions would be the better path forward for saving lives. Along with the fall of “herd immunity,” we also witnessed the admitted faults with the PCR tests, including the entirely inaccurate CDC assay as well as the fear of the inability of the test to detect all cases of the “virus.” Granted, this fear of false-negative results was used to bolster the case for increased and more frequent testing. Somehow it “made sense” that if a PCR test told you that you did not have the “virus,” you must continue to test until it says that you do have the “virus.” Apparently, this questioning of the accuracy of the PCR results didn't work both ways as massive amounts of entirely healthy people tested positive with no symptoms whatsoever. These false-positive results were accepted without further testing.

Other fun tidbits include the debate over how the “virus” supposedly spread as well as evidence that it was not possible to catch the “virus” in grocery stores and at the hair salon, thus making lockdowns and masking utterly meaningless. There is some information on the predictive powers of both Bill Gates and Anthony Fauci, the comically absurd fear that the ocean sneezes out “viruses,” and the first animal to test PCR positive for “SARS-COV-2.” Oh, and the WHO also tried to walk back an early tweet denying human-to-human transmission. 😉